Andrew (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Flying Fokker
- Start date
Sky_Blue_Daz
Well-Known Member
So forgive my ignorance in this , but would Andrew give up names and details by way of a plea bargain. Or would he be looked after by “ higher ups “
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He hasn’t actually been charged with anything
LarryGrayson
Well-Known Member
his tittles have gone because his a sleazebag and the queen ant around to protect him no more
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Why are you defending him
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Im not. He hasn’t been charged has he? It’s factually accurate
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Yep that’s not what’s happening here
Seems clear he’s used his position to screw young girls and got away with it
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Even the Asian lawyer whose a labour lord I think and frequently on the BBC said there is little chance of prosecution as the evidence isn’t there
Nick
Administrator
I thought we felt sorry for nonces and it's just the same as somebody having a wank?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
12 step Andrew
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Just shows how you have no idea
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Yep lets make fun of a rich and powerful man taking advantage of women
Fuckin hilarious
Grendel
Well-Known Member
If he wasnt rich and powerful you’d be trying to defend his actions and help him recover!
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Never defend the action
People do the crime they need to pay for their actions
Nick
Administrator
Weird that you defend it on another thread and compare it to somebody watching porn.
At least be consistent when you play it down. What's changed?
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Nick
Administrator
You literally spent a couple of hours comparing it to somebody watching porn or having a beer and how its an addiction, it's also ok to be friends with the abusers.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
That’s your perception of what I was saying and a couple of hours lol
And again no I didn’t
I would never defend what someone has done I’m not sure it’s worth discussing this with you
You have made your decisions
You think it’s ok to be friends with people who commit crime so do I
Nick
Administrator
I think it's ok to be friends with somebody who has a fight when drunk outside a nightclub when they are young.
You think it's ok to be friends with child sex offenders.
The whole Andrew thing is not much different to the whole grooming gang stuff. People hid and defended it.
Hopefully the c**t gets tortured until he names everybody who was harming kids.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
You’re so funny
You’ve added again some mitigation to your mate having a fight again.
I may have made it hard for you and others to understand what I was saying.
Epstein never admitted what he had done and I was not saying that it was ok to be friends with Epstein
I was surprised that you and others were saying that it was always wrong to remain friends with any person convicted of a sexual offence. That there is a difference between someone taking responsibility for their actions and someone that doesn’t
Nick
Administrator
No I haven't?
I simply said I don't think it's right or ok to be friends with a convicted child sex offender.
Dont come on this thread acting outraged when on another you have been comparing it to somebody watching porn or having a beer.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Stop it I didn’t
And I do think it’s ok bring friends in certain circumstances
alexccfc99
Well-Known Member
His two daughters are 'non-working' Royals anyway, the worst thing that will happen to them is possibly having to give up their Princess title
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Must be a tough life
Notwithstanding the Epstein shit and that he’s a general prick anyway, but it’s always struck me as weird the fact that he still lived with Fergie even years after they got divorced…. Really bloody strange.
almost like keeping her close cos she was in that ‘circle of trust’ cos she was involved in it all as well.
Allegedly…..
almost like keeping her close cos she was in that ‘circle of trust’ cos she was involved in it all as well.
Allegedly…..
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
The rampant abuse and exploitation of vulnerable people by Epstein and his associates is one thing, but we mustn't forget that this was the mechanism for him to gain leverage over some of the most powerful and wealthy people on the planet. He's then used that to influence governments all over the world. It was an enormous honeypot operation.
Andrew was his way in to the upper echelons of the British establishment.
Andrew was his way in to the upper echelons of the British establishment.
It's astonishing really the amount of control that one man had over some of the richest and most important people in the world. Like something out of a movie. Grim.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
One man a solo operation.I don't think that's even vaguely accurate.
I'm not saying he ran the world or anything! But clearly he held a lot of sway and had a lot of influence over people in governments and decision makers etc
alexccfc99
Well-Known Member
He had a pretty poor reputation of a spoiled, mollycoddled royal who was the most difficult to work with or for before all this Epstein stuff was even a thing
I am no major royalist, but I think his sister is a tremendous woman the difference between the two was, is and always will be chalk and cheese
PaulPUSB
Well-Known Member
Yeah the queen prob protected him as she knew what he was like. Would have broke her if all this had came out whilst she was still alive.
Sent from my SM-A176B using Tapatalk