Andrew (1 Viewer)

[rob9872]

Read nobody’s girl if you can stomach it us men have a lot to answer for
Loads of good men and women knew what was going on but did fuck all and are as complicit in my book

Not at all. I've said it because she looks older. If it proves different, throw the book, but equally speculating on a photo with no head and assuming it under age is wrong too.

 

---

[Sky Blue Pete]

Not at all. I've said it because she looks older. If it proves different, throw the book, but equally speculating on a photo with no head and assuming it under age is wrong too.

Yep

 

[rob9872]

Yep

Sorry Pete, meant to quote @Sick Boy

 

[Terry_dactyl]

Not at all. I've said it because she looks older. If it proves different, throw the book, but equally speculating on a photo with no head and assuming it under age is wrong too.

Isn’t a main point with these photos the how/why they exist at all? ie how/why has a known pedeophile/sex trafficker got fairly intimate pictures of a member of the royal family.

 

[Sick Boy]

Not at all. I've said it because she looks older. If it proves different, throw the book, but equally speculating on a photo with no head and assuming it under age is wrong too.

I was talking about in general rather than the photo; even more stories are coming out Second Epstein victim claims she was sent to UK for sex with Andrew, lawyer says - you'd have to be incredibly naive to think that this wasn't already known about amongst the RF.

 

[rob9872]

I was talking about in general rather than the photo; even more stories are coming out Second Epstein victim claims she was sent to UK for sex with Andrew, lawyer says - you'd have to be incredibly naive to think that this wasn't already known about amongst the RF.

I'm sure they did and as I've said, I agree he's wrong. What it doesnt say, in that article either is about age. No moral conpass for sure, it was the only paedo accusation in that instance that I was challenging.

 

[Ccfcisparks]

I'm sure they did and as I've said, I agree he's wrong. What it doesnt say, in that article either is about age. No moral conpass for sure, it was the only paedo accusation in that instance that I was challenging.

Peado, sex pest, its all two sides of the same coin

 

[SBT]

Think there’s now an outside chance (however remote) that he gets pulled in front of Congress which would be devastating for the royal family.

 

[LarryGrayson]

werent he the queens favourite thats why he got indulged

 

[Otis]

werent he the queens favourite thats why he got indulged

Weren't he?

Off with is ed!!

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Think there’s now an outside chance (however remote) that he gets pulled in front of Congress which would be devastating for the royal family.

Trump will be insisting anyone else high profile gets called up to protect himself.

 

[LarryGrayson]

Weren't he?

Off with is ed!!

i no millibands a lefty but dont think hes a sex pest is he

 

[Johnnythespider]

Didn't the papers always call him Randy Andy when they ran a story about him.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Didn't the papers always call him Randy Andy when they ran a story about him.

The sad thing is many of us no friends who treated girls and women shockingly but very few of us called them out