Am I missing something? (2 Viewers)

[japandy]

I was wrong to say I was going to Northampton and for seemingly backing SISU even though I wasn't, but many of the threads on here have me wondering that ACL are the victims? ACL were one of the reasons why; 1. we went into administration in the first place 2. They refused to sign the CVA 3. They were the main reason the Chinese investors cooled their interest because ACL refuse to sell their share And now people are saying we should sell out the Ricoh for an 'old boys' friendly. As far as I am concerned ACL are nearly as bad as SISU and the sooner they moe on the better. I will NOT step into Sixfields but also if ACL are at the Ricoh I will NOT be going there either.

 

---

[kirby485]

The Ricoh is a Multi purpose venue, ACL oversees all of these, whether it is the football stadium, or the jaguar exhibition hall, other conference rooms etc. ACL don't need a non rent paying football club to make a profit. So ACL will remain at the Ricoh irrespective of where we end up. The issue we have is both sides are in the wrong. ACL charged an inflated rent, and more than likely knew this. SISU took over the club as a way of tapping into the profit making capabilities of the Ricoh, when this didn't happen, the club was used as a pawn to try and bully ACL, a tactic that didn't work.