Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Adam Barton (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter PVA
  • Start date Aug 2, 2014
Forums New posts
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #1
Pressley: "I must say though that I was delighted with the attitude of Adam Barton who has been out in the cold a bit but his attitude towards playing the game tonight was first class
Click to expand...


Is he this year's Jordan Clarke? Told to leave but then forces his way back in with a positive reaction and attitude?

Personally I hope he stays. Yes we all know he has limitations. But if we are playing 352 then we are gonna need to have a fair few centre midfielders on the books. Plus in a midfield 3 his defensive frailties will be less exposed compared to when he has played in a central 2 for us, and he'll be able to play his natural game more freely.
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #2
PVA said:
Is he this year's Jordan Clarke? Told to leave but then forces his way back in with a positive reaction and attitude?

Personally I hope he stays. Yes we all know he has limitations. But if we are playing 352 then we are gonna need to have a fair few centre midfielders on the books. Plus in a midfield 3 his defensive frailties will be less exposed compared to when he has played in a central 2 for us, and he'll be able to play his natural game more freely.
Click to expand...

Just maybe it'll be .......... Carl Baker ??????????
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #3
No, I still think he'll be off if they can get someone to take him off our hands.
 
J

jabharty

Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #4
I doubt we will play a 3-5-2 regularly. If we're using wing backs, it'll be tough to fit in O'Brien and Swanson. Sounds like it'll be our back-up plan.
He had a good run in the side middle of last season, but there must be something Pressley doesn't like about him. Possibly work ethic?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #5
To be fair it's not just Pressley, Robins quickly bombed him out the side when he arrived too, and he didn't get a kick on loan at Fleetwood towards the end of last season either.

He's featured on just 36 league games in 2 seasons, and he hasn't been out injured during that time.
 
Last edited: Aug 2, 2014

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #6
stupot07 said:
To be fair it's not just Pressley, Robins quickly bombed him out the side when he arrived too, and he didn't get a kick on loan at Fleetwood towards the end of last season either.

He's featured on just 36 league games in 2 seasons, and he hasn't been out injured during that time.
Click to expand...

To be fair, that's twice as many as Mohamed Coulibaly has had in his entire career (2 years older) and he was only injured last season. And Barton was recovering from a long term injury when he joined us.

So by your logic we shouldn't have signed Coulibaly
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #7
shmmeee said:
To be fair, that's twice as many as Mohamed Coulibaly has had in his entire career (2 years older) and he was only injured last season. And Barton was recovering from a long term injury when he joined us.

So by your logic we shouldn't have signed Coulibaly
Click to expand...

I agree we shouldn't of signed him. We've had plenty of sick notes over the last few years (bell, mcpake, etc). You can't afford to be wasting money on injury prone players.

But my point was it's not just SP that doesn't rate Barton, Robins bombed him out the side too. And as he's actually our player, we payed a decent fee for him and have been paying his wages for 2 years, he has failed to force himself in the side with 2 players younger than him (Thomas and Daniels) have been above him in the pecking order.

Like I said he has only featured in 46 league game due to not being good enough, not due to injury. And year after a long term lay off you can make some excuses for his first season, but they must surely be null and void for last season.

He has good technique, looks nice on the ball, but is serious lacking mentally and physically.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #8
RFC said:
Just maybe it'll be .......... Carl Baker ??????????
Click to expand...

I think Baker has pissed somebody off, especially with his facebook comments he keeps deleting.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #9
shmmeee said:
So by your logic we shouldn't have signed Coulibaly
Click to expand...

a complete waste of a wage..
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #10
ccfcway said:
a complete waste of a wage..
Click to expand...

Are we paying his wage? Or do Bournemouth want us to try and get him fit?
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #11
Hobo said:
Are we paying his wage? Or do Bournemouth want us to try and get him fit?
Click to expand...


whilst i havent got his pay slip in front of me, why would bournemouth send him to us for free when they could have him as part of their squad doing the same thing ?
 

WONDERLAMPS

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #12
ccfcway said:
whilst i havent got his pay slip in front of me, why would bournemouth send him to us for free when they could have him as part of their squad doing the same thing ?
Click to expand...

As part if the Wilson deal.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #13
ccfcway said:
whilst i havent got his pay slip in front of me, why would bournemouth send him to us for free when they could have him as part of their squad doing the same thing ?
Click to expand...

To get him fit and get him game time, which he won't get in the championship. I imagine we're contributing little to his wages, but like you think it's a waste of a signing.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #14
ccfcway said:
whilst i havent got his pay slip in front of me, why would bournemouth send him to us for free when they could have him as part of their squad doing the same thing ?
Click to expand...

Perhaps they feel he will be higher up the pecking order here if fit and potentially get more game time in. Hopefully then return to them in January and hit the ground running. Or he may no longer be part of their plans and they want to get him fit and get him back in the shop window.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #15
RFC said:
Just maybe it'll be .......... Carl Baker ??????????
Click to expand...

It should be Carl Baker because if he has half a brain he won't be forced to do the same job somewhere else for less money.

If he does that can we afford to have someone of his ability and wages sitting there doing nothing? No we can't

We would be forced to use him and he will have a point to proof.

Low and behold we get our creative midfielder.

Just a shame he will need to catch up in the fitness
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #16
I think we just need to wait for the message that Baker has left by mutual consent.
 
C

Cheshireskyblue

New Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #17
I Agree!

ccfcway said:
a complete waste of a wage..
Click to expand...
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #18
I went last night and Barton was different class.
Bossed the game.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #19
westcountry_skyblue said:
I went last night and Barton was different class.
Bossed the game.
Click to expand...

Good to hear. I really do hope he can force his way back in. Had/has a lot of potential but needs to start showing it on a regular basis.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #20
I think a midfield 3 would really suit Barton. I like him a lot, my kind of player. But he's got to learn to press if he's going to play for Pressley.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #21
shmmeee said:
I think a midfield 3 would really suit Barton. I like him a lot, my kind of player. But he's got to learn to press if he's going to play for Pressley.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see him come good too, both for the team and for himself. There's got to be something gritty about the bloke, because he's certainly not throwing the towel in. It would be great to see everyone get behind him and really give him some encouragement - maybe a bit of confidence would make all of the difference.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #22
duffer said:
I'd like to see him come good too, both for the team and for himself. There's got to be something gritty about the bloke, because he's certainly not throwing the towel in. It would be great to see everyone get behind him and really give him some encouragement - maybe a bit of confidence would make all of the difference.
Click to expand...

He's definitely a confidence player, unfortunately those don't tend to do well at City.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #23
shmmeee said:
He's definitely a confidence player, unfortunately those don't tend to do well at City.
Click to expand...

They don't tend to do that well at most clubs tbf. Clubs need players who can put in 6.5-7/10 performances week in week out.
 

skybluefred

New Member
  • Aug 2, 2014
  • #24
Barton is probably the most creative player on the clubs books. Unfortunately tackling is not part of his make up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?