A question for those in the know... (3 Viewers)

[Brighton Sky Blue]

If, as Tim Fisher so frequently likes to state, CCFC Holdings is to all intents and purposes the football club and Limited is a subsidiary with no assets other than the Ricoh lease, why is he also concerned about sporting sanctions being applied on the basis of what happens to Limited?

 

---

[The Prefect]

Because CCFC Ltd held the Football Leagues golden share.

SISU's stance that Holdings is the football club when it hasn't been until last year constitutes a legal debate about 'beneficial ownership'. It's all smoke and mirrors.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Because CCFC Ltd held the Football Leagues golden share.

SISU's stance that Holdings is the football club when it hasn't been until last year constitutes a legal debate about 'beneficial ownership'. It's all smoke and mirrors.

But if Fisher is so convinced that he's right, why is he seemingly backtracking on it?

 

[The Prefect]

But if Fisher is so convinced that he's right, why is he seemingly backtracking on it?

Fisher knows he's not right. SISU have to maintain a public position of being right or the whole pack of cards falls... If they make enough noise they hope they hope no-one will challenge them.

 

[skybluericoh]

Tim Fisher probably believes his own PR. Mr hitler believed he had several armies that were going to smash the russians and the western allies would join in, and destroy Stalin in april/ may 1945 we know Hitler was wrong, with Mr fisher we'll have to wait and see.

 

[Senior Vick from Alicante]

The term beneficial ownership is getting Sisu in trouble. They use it with league to claim the golden share, but say in the case of ACL that its not the club, as I have stated before ACL have them by the balls you can't have it both ways and the law is definitely on ACL side and SISU and Fisher know it. This is going all the way friends.

 

[Sky Blue Harry H]

But if Fisher is so convinced that he's right, why is he seemingly backtracking on it?

Not sure he's convinced he's right on a few things - just sounds like he's convinced

 

[skybluericoh]

Some years back, i was told 'if you say something loud enough and with enough conviction, 95% of people will believe it. Just don't do it if the 5% are in the room.' I've since learn't that the 5% are always in the room, usually the 95% are missing. Maybe he's been on the same course, just hasn't learn't the lesson???

 

[SkyblueBazza]

Some years back, i was told 'if you say something loud enough and with enough conviction, 95% of people will believe it. Just don't do it if the 5% are in the room.' I've since learn't that the 5% are always in the room, usually the 95% are missing. Maybe he's been on the same course, just hasn't learn't the lesson???

Lol...that's all we need - some corporate bllx to confuse/annoy a few more people

 

[chiefdave]

But if Fisher is so convinced that he's right, why is he seemingly backtracking on it?

if you recall the didn't contest the points deduction so accepted that Ltd was the football club. they claim the player contracts are with holdings, which I guess they are as Appleton must surely have checked but that doesn't answer the question of whether the FL knew they had been moved. They were then talking about claiming a right over the share through beneficial ownership. don't see how they can do that but then say the lease on the Rioch is nothing to do with them as it's in Ltd.