To be fair, there's plenty of instances of girls making up rape claims, and there's an entire industry around kiss and tell and footballers.
But the guy was convicted, so... Then again, as I said with King. If you want to punish them for life, make that the sentence, otherwise society has a role to play in rehabilitating offenders.
because it's easy to get people to sign a petition against a rapist on the internet.
If we're going to learn from this, can i suggest the next petition michael does has either a picture of a cat on it that we claim tim fisher is mistreating, or a dying child whose last wish is to see ccfc home.
I'm sorry, but this is bullshit. What gets men into life-changing trouble with regard to rape and sexual assault is not understanding that no means no. A girl being pissed, and/or stoned, and/or wearing a short-skirt is no excuse for the kind of chickenshit wankers who struggle to understand that simple fact.
Evans was convicted, that's a matter of public record. He had his day in a court of law, and a judge and a jury convicted him. If you've got some facts at your disposal that could overturn his conviction, go to the police with them. Otherwise this looks a lot like you've got some kind of issue with women, and the actual facts are just a sideline to your problem.
Marlon King still pled his innocence with regard to sexual assualt too, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It's the act of a coward. A man who can't accept what he does is wrong, isn't likely to change. Guess where he is now.
It's not really punishment to not want people muttering about being humbled in the convict's presence, not wanting people who work for womens' charitees ridiculed and insulted for having a view, and not really punished by suggesting they shouldn't just walk straight into the job they had before at a huge salary... because they can knock the ball in the net.
It's not really punishment to not want people muttering about being humbled in the convict's presence, not wanting people who work for womens' charitees ridiculed and insulted for having a view, and not really punished by suggesting they shouldn't just walk straight into the job they had before at a huge salary... because they can knock the ball in the net.
I like my legal system along the whole "Rather 100 guilty men go free than 1 wrongly convicted" lines. As I said, not passing comment on a particular case, just stating that it is a viable use case in this scenario, are you comfortable making that trade off? Personally, I'm not.
I also believe you don't rehabilitate someone into society by ostracising them. But that's an argument for another day.
Edit: Marlon King, Sisu, and countless Year 8 boys certainly do test this argument. What do you do to someone who continually reoffends/shows disregard for the system? But I think you can account for repeat offenders without treating everyone like them. (Side note: I have no idea if this is the first time for Evans or a pattern of behaviour).
Others can never work in their chosen profession again, if they commit the type of crime Evans has... you for one, I suspect! That, of course, is not the same as ostracising them...