HighfieldRoad1899-2005
New Member
There has been a lot of complaining recently about the diamond, but which formation would anyone actually want? No point complaining if there are no suggestions.
Simple 4-4-2? Or will the fact that the majority of teams in the league can beat us man for man mean we lose too many to stay up?
Could a 4-3-3/4-5-1 system work? Would allow us (attempt to ) control the middle of the pitch. We need width that isn't just from the full backs!
As for Thorn, it's all been said before.
He's not doing a great job, but could be doing worse. The football can be fairly good (as was the case against West Ham), but we lack that bit of quality that would have sealed the game out... Platt getting the ball on the halfway line and failing to play Duke in springs to mind. He also lacks that managerial experience that can scrape a win when playing badly (Big Sam) . I fail to see what good bringing in anyone else would do, mainly because no one will want the job.
As for the Carsley argument - replace one inexperienced manager for someone even less experienced... genius.
Simple 4-4-2? Or will the fact that the majority of teams in the league can beat us man for man mean we lose too many to stay up?
Could a 4-3-3/4-5-1 system work? Would allow us (attempt to ) control the middle of the pitch. We need width that isn't just from the full backs!
As for Thorn, it's all been said before.
He's not doing a great job, but could be doing worse. The football can be fairly good (as was the case against West Ham), but we lack that bit of quality that would have sealed the game out... Platt getting the ball on the halfway line and failing to play Duke in springs to mind. He also lacks that managerial experience that can scrape a win when playing badly (Big Sam) . I fail to see what good bringing in anyone else would do, mainly because no one will want the job.
As for the Carsley argument - replace one inexperienced manager for someone even less experienced... genius.