3 4 3 (1 Viewer)

SBAndy · Apr 19, 2016

Maybe not the most secure and cohesive we've looked this season, but I actually found it quite fun to watch. Could have done with Haynes at LWB rather than Ricketts though. And the WBs were too high up the pitch, which left no room for them to run into.

skybluke02 · Apr 19, 2016

Obviously works if it's played against the type of team Bradford are

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nick · Apr 19, 2016

The wing backs were very high, it neutralized theirs. It worked well

cmoncity · Apr 19, 2016

Was anyone else bored to tears until rose scored?

clint van damme · Apr 19, 2016

cmoncity said:
Was anyone else bored to tears until rose scored?

Certainly the people sat either side if you

covcity4life · Apr 19, 2016

Phillips and ricketts only.like to pass backwards so it could be improved with competent wingbacks

cmoncity · Apr 19, 2016

I just thought we lacked movement in general and fleck and cole were so deep in the 1st half they couldnt influence anything.

steve82 · Apr 19, 2016

The 352 worked very well to nullify them getting forward and putting crosses in our box. I had hoped TM had a plan when I seen Maddison was playing as he left Phillips very exposed Saturday.
Top marks TM!

SBAndy · Apr 19, 2016

Nick said:
The wing backs were very high, it neutralized theirs. It worked well

Not quite as I saw it. It meant they could never receive a pass in front of them as they were too close to the opposition full backs, and left a lot of space for their wide players - I'm thinking Kyel Reid in particular there. But hey ho, we won, so it obviously wasn't as terrible as I thought.

cmoncity · Apr 19, 2016

I really think if we had played a team on there game we would have got hammered tonight. But a wins a win so we will take it.just hope we can score a few goals before end of season

clint van damme · Apr 19, 2016

we won, so surely TM got his tactics right?

stupot07 · Apr 19, 2016

I thought the system (352)was poor and didn't work with the players we had playing, Armstrong was far too isolated, lamieres and maddison play too deep and done make runs in behind, that meant it was often 361, ricketts has no left foot and because of Reid's pace Phillips really didn't get much further forward than the halfway line. We were forced to have a lot of ball in our own half, Armstrong came deeper and deeper at times

It wasn't until the introduction if rose, a player who will look to make runs in behind armstong, that we scored from such a run, then gave their defense something different to think about.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

torchomatic · Apr 19, 2016

SBAndy said:
Maybe not the most secure and cohesive we've looked this season, but I actually found it quite fun to watch. Could have done with Haynes at LWB rather than Ricketts though. And the WBs were too high up the pitch, which left no room for them to run into.

I thought it was 3 5 2.

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Nick · Apr 19, 2016

Vincelot dropped back to right back, Stephens the left side

SBAndy · Apr 19, 2016

torchomatic said:
I thought it was 3 5 2.

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

The way I saw it was 3 at the back (Vincelot, Martin, Stephens), 4 in 'midfield' (Phillips, Cole, Fleck, Ricketts) and 3 up top (Maddison and Lameiras slightly withdrawn from Armstrong).

speedie87 · Apr 19, 2016

When we had the ball first half it was 3-2-4-1, without 4 -3-2-1

Nick · Apr 19, 2016

speedie87 said:
When we had the ball first half it was 3-2-4-1, without 4 -3-2-1

Yeah the wing backs were right up

stupot07 · Apr 19, 2016

speedie87 said:
When we had the ball first half it was 3-2-4-1, without 4 -3-2-1

It was more like

3-2----------------4-1 with the ball

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Calista · Apr 19, 2016

Nick said:
Yeah the wing backs were right up

And realistically, neither Phillips nor Ricketts is a wing back. For me, there were too many square pegs in round holes. Enjoyable game though.

3 4 3 (1 Viewer)

SBAndy

Well-Known Member

skybluke02

New Member

Nick

Administrator

cmoncity

New Member

clint van damme

Well-Known Member

covcity4life

Well-Known Member

cmoncity

New Member

steve82

Well-Known Member

SBAndy

Well-Known Member

cmoncity

New Member

clint van damme

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

SBAndy

Well-Known Member

speedie87

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

stupot07

Well-Known Member

Calista

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

3 4 3 (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

New Member

Administrator

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency