Transfer Rumour 25/26 Summer Transfer Window (49 Viewers)

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Think we can all agree that even if we don't have the money to seriously spunk out on someone like Doyle that we still need to bring in at least one capable of challenging the 2 CBs for a place in the team. Can't see any way back in for Lati or Binks other than covering for injuries, we've seen enough of both and what we've seen isn't very good.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
and pace. Don't want a new CB if they're not quick.

Yeah good point. Don’t think Doyle was particularly was he?
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
Agreed, but then this is my point. How can we attract and get much better than our current 2 without spending a fortune?
We dont need to spend a fortune. How much did Gyokeres cost us?

There's also plenty of good talent abroad that we can tap into. If we get a reasonable amount for Simms and BTA we could easily replace them.

If we did choose to cash in on Wright we'd get good money, and could bring in a decent striker with a good record.

There's plenty of options for Frank to think about.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Think we can all agree that even if we don't have the money to seriously spunk out on someone like Doyle that we still need to bring in at least one capable of challenging the 2 CBs for a place in the team. Can't see any way back in for Lati or Binks other than covering for injuries, we've seen enough of both and what we've seen isn't very good.
The upgrades should be looking at Binks and Lati rather than Kitching and Thomas.

Suggesting a new CB to replace either of them is a priority is pretty nuts.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
We had the second best attack outside the top two last year. Spending all summer discussing strikers is more nuts TBH
Strikers are more fun to discuss tbf and i don't really think the fact we scored a lot as a team should hide the fact that most our CFs weren't very good. Like Rudoni scored loads so lay off Simms doesn't wash with me. I'd be genuinely amazed if Lampard didn't bring in a least 1 while moving on at least 1 of BTA/Simms.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
We are significantly better with Kitching in the team than without.
I agree, but I still don’t think Kitching plays at the consistently high level that you’d need or expect for a promotion-calibre team. Which is probably why we haven’t got promoted while he’s playing in it.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
The upgrades should be looking at Binks and Lati rather than Kitching and Thomas.

Suggesting a new CB to replace either of them is a priority is pretty nuts.
Depends on what's available. Money isn't infinite which is why i feel if we really want to kick on we sell MvE for the big bucks. If we can upgrade Kitching or Thomas then great, why wouldn't we. If we can only afford to upgrade Lati or Binks that's also ok, as i'd happily never have to watch either play for us again.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Grimes dropping deep is clearly tactical, and even with better distribution from centre halves cant imagine it would change

The one thing I think with Doyle though (accepting it’s HIGHLY unlikely) is that he could play LB and when the supply is cut off to Grimes he could tuck across to form that back 3 and get us playing out.

Separate note to a later point, I also think Thomas is fairly quick which is one of his redeeming features.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
As a priority? Really?
For me yeah, I mean how many silly goals did we concede?. We scored if I’m not wrong the second highest in the division. Not to mention that our back up for CB is arguably some of the weakest depth in the squad.

Then you add in that neither of our CBs have the pace to play the high line and get caught out due to it (stoke second for example), and neither distribution is great and it becomes a priory for how we want to play Imo.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
"Our problems were conceding not scoring" doesn't really wash with me when our defence was a lot better without a clown in goal and Lati 🤢 or Binks 🤮 in the backline.


We massively underperformed our xG and that points to underperforming strikers. Rudoni being great from midfield and EMC having a purple patch doesn't mean we can't look at upgrading at least 1 of Simms and BTA and expecting more from Wright.

To clarify I would still bring in a CB but they would be competition with Kitch and Thomas while binning off the other two chancers. A competent LB would help us massively too.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
I agree, but I still don’t think Kitching plays at the consistently high level that you’d need or expect for a promotion-calibre team. Which is probably why we haven’t got promoted while he’s playing in it.
I mean I don’t disagree either but is that because if kitching was out of the team Binks or Lati was in it, rather than Kitching being a great CB?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
For me yeah, I mean how many silly goals did we concede?. We scored if I’m not wrong the second highest in the division. Not to mention that our back up for CB is arguably some of the weakest depth in the squad.

Then you add in that neither of our CBs have the pace to play the high line and get caught out due to it (stoke second for example), and neither distribution is great and it becomes a priory for how we want to play Imo.
Wasn't the 2nd Stoke goal the one that was miles offside?
 

Viktor17

Well-Known Member
The one thing I think with Doyle though (accepting it’s HIGHLY unlikely) is that he could play LB and when the supply is cut off to Grimes he could tuck across to form that back 3 and get us playing out.

Separate note to a later point, I also think Thomas is fairly quick which is one of his redeeming features.
Agree re BT, and he spends time bailing out LK who’s not quick, hence pulling him all over shop.

BT still little raw, but all ingredients for a very good defender.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
Wasn't the 2nd Stoke goal the one that was miles offside?
Looked onside to me but will double check I’m remembering right but there were other times I remember. If I’m not wrong the second Wednesday goal was caused by a striker running at us and breaking the line for example

Edit: sorry was referring to the first goal where Gallagher ran past our defence

IMG_0079.jpeg
 
Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
"Our problems were conceding not scoring" doesn't really wash with me when our defence was a lot better without a clown in goal and Lati 🤢 or Binks 🤮 in the backline.


We massively underperformed our xG and that points to underperforming strikers. Rudoni being great from midfield and EMC having a purple patch doesn't mean we can't look at upgrading at least 1 of Simms and BTA and expecting more from Wright.

To clarify I would still bring in a CB but they would be competition with Kitch and Thomas while binning off the other two chancers. A competent LB would help us massively too.

Similarly Dovin having a purple patch doesn’t change the fact we went out of the playoffs because of our defence, and nearly lost the playoffs because of them too. We had a semi decent record when we completely changed our style to five at the back and longer balls out, but that’s not sustainable. Same as how Wilson and RCC are technically our best keepers in terms of clean sheets but we all know it’s because we changed the entire team set up.

As someone else said our CBs really hamper how we want to play and ultimately will be the difference between us going up or not. We may have underperformed out xG but it was the third highest in the division and our xGA was the seventh lowest. Only Bristol had worse in the top six.
 

2024/25 League 1 Champs?

Well-Known Member
changing the subject, and it may have been said on another thread this morning, I haven’t checked, but Fulham have agreed a deal with Tete so maybe their interest in MVE will cool, and Everton are apparently after Walker-Peters, which can only be a good thing?
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
Agree re BT, and he spends time bailing out LK who’s not quick, hence pulling him all over shop.

BT still little raw, but all ingredients for a very good defender.
We're getting into the realms of fantasy now . Kitching leads the defence when he plays , he constantly cajoles and positions Thomas and his full back into position, hence why he's been made captain.
To suggest Thomas is quick and constantly bails out Kitching is frankly horseshit
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
We're getting into the realms of fantasy now . Kitching leads the defence when he plays , he constantly cajoles and positions Thomas and his full back into position, hence why he's been made captain.
To suggest Thomas is quick and constantly bails out Kitching is frankly horseshit
To be fair to them both, I think both are decent championship CBs. Just would want better in one position. That way we have much better depth, can sell Lati or Binks and then can rotate between the 4-2-3-1 and a 5-3-2 depending on the opposition
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
To be fair to them both, I think both are decent championship CBs. Just would want better in one position. That way we have much better depth, can sell Lati or Binks and then can rotate between the 4-2-3-1 and a 5-3-2 depending on the opposition
100 percent agree it is an area we need more depth and quality. I'm hoping that Brau and KHH might help shore things up at the back cause not all our issues conceding came from central areas
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
100 percent agree it is an area we need more depth and quality. I'm hoping that Brau and KHH might help shore things up at the back cause not all our issues conceding came from central areas
No I don’t disagree with that. LB had a lot of the blame imo. Still think all the defence can be very shaky espically against quick transactions as seen against Sunderland
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top