Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
If you’re Rudoni why would you sign that if you back your own ability
If you’re Rudoni why would you sign that if you back your own abilityI'd give Rudoni an improved contract with a release clause of £35m.
But not getting promotion mean selling our better players for both our financial sake and the players ambitions. No guarantee we get promoted with Rudoni in the team. He wasnt the difference this year was he? Nobody wants him to be sold but you have to be realisticThe planet where I want to keep Rudoni, Im not saying we can get that for him Im saying thats what I’d ask to price them out but if they are dumb enough to pay 25m+ which they wont take it. Promotion to the prem wins you 100m and Rudi can be the difference between getting there and not
lots of clubs will watch him, unlikely they are going to make a bid let alone a bid that will interest usNormally I would agree, but that article came from Craig Hope - the most clued in Newcastle reporter going who has multiple links inside the club.
He's not the type of guy to rely on agent whispers to get Newcastle info. He doesn't need to.
We have other assets and Rudi is someone our team is currently designed around, he is the central cog to how we work most of the time, he was the difference a lot of the time this year, to me he’s the least replaceable of all our assets currentlyBut not getting promotion mean selling our better players for both our financial sake and the players ambitions. No guarantee we get promoted with Rudoni in the team. He wasnt the difference this year was he? Nobody wants him to be sold but you have to be realistic
Because you want more money!If you’re Rudoni why would you sign that if you back your own ability
What do you think we’d realistically get for Milan? We know how good he is but fullbacks don’t go for mega money, £10m at the most I think.
£20m up front minimum for Rudi IMO
Rutter had played Prem and Bundesliga footballRutter went to Brighton for £40m, similar ages, and Rudoni's stats this season are far superior to Rutter's the season he was sold.
I'm not saying we would get £40m for Rudoni, but the Rutter fee is a good benchmark.
Rutter had played Prem and Bundesliga football
I’d suggest the ownership would differ in opinion and anything above £20m would be considered.Yes, when Brighton signed him he'd played 11 premier league games, scored none and got 1 assist.
I take your point RE Bundesliga, but Rudoni should still command £30m+ if you ask me.
Anything less, and it's a no thank you.
We would not get anywhere near 30 million for him. There’s no precedent to suggest it’s remotely viableWe signed him 12 months ago, plenty of time left on his contract and Doug won't take a lowball offer and weaken the squad.
He's a shrewd businessman £20m would be an absolute steal and I think we'd all feel short changed.
We aren't in League 1 any more.
We will not get 30 million for a player that’s never played top flight football in Europe. Some of you live in a fantasy world
They haven’t paid that much for player based on a good several monthsOther clubs have paid that.
Rutter went to Brighton for £40m, similar ages, and Rudoni's stats this season are superior to Rutter's the season he was sold.
I'm not saying we would get £40m for Rudoni, but the Rutter fee is a good benchmark.
We would not get anywhere near 30 million for him. There’s no precedent to suggest it’s remotely viable
Gyokeres and Hamer were also but they still got sold. Other assets we may have but if a team bids the money for Rudoni you cant offer them other assets can you? I get it you love him and dont want him to leave but its the way football works now.We have other assets and Rudi is someone our team is currently designed around, he is the central cog to how we work most of the time, he was the difference a lot of the time this year, to me he’s the least replaceable of all our assets currently
We would not get anywhere near 30 million for him. There’s no precedent to suggest it’s remotely viable
they were much further into their contracts than Rudi currently is and/or had been told they would sell them that summerGyokeres and Hamer were also but they still got sold. Other assets we may have but if a team bids the money for Rudoni you cant offer them other assets can you? I get it you love him and dont want him to leave but its the way football works now.
Kind of the point. We want to keep him, ergo it would take a price that likely no one would pay to prise him away.
There's a less than zero chance that the £40m quoted would've been the actual figure. It would've been the fee tabled to activate the release clause but realistically it would've also been very heavily add-on based.
Right well there’s another reason you can’t use Ritter as a bench mark for Rudoni.Leeds signed him for £36m.
You cant activate a release clause by saying we'll give you £20m now and £20m in 12 months.
He went for £40m and you don't need add ons as there was a release clause.
I agree with most of what you are saying but Man United have agreed with Wolves to pay Cunha's release fee in 3 parts.Leeds signed him for £36m.
You cant activate a release clause by saying we'll give you £20m now and £20m in 12 months.
He went for £40m and you don't need add ons as there was a release clause.
Leeds signed him for £36m.
You cant activate a release clause by saying we'll give you £20m now and £20m in 12 months.
He went for £40m and you don't need add ons as there was a release clause.
Yes in people’s fantasy fifa world, we want to keep him and therefore ask for something unrealistic.
In King’s business reality if someone offers to turn a £3m investment into a £20m cash flow after a year you absolutely consider it.
If you’re Rudoni why would you sign that if you back your own ability
No they didn't. It was a £25m deal with £10m of add-ons most of which they didn't have to pay due to them being relegated. It's idiotic to think that Leeds made a £15m profit on him from a season in the championship.
SISU would have been banding him around for £10m.This is SISU level transfer thinking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?