You are the first to moan we dont buy quality. Now you advocate deals where its the equivalant of throwing money down the bog.
If you had his sausage any further down your throat his balls would be resting on your chinIf we had only got him on a loan you would still be holding up your hilarious 'Bling Out' banners
I cannot.I fucking love The Inbetweeners. Can Mr. Gilbert play centre half?
Any more news on the lad Godo from Fulham?
Worst case scenario is that he has a few shit seasons , they can't shift him on and have spent £5M - £8M plus £1M a season in wages .How is it throwing money down the toilet?
Worst case scenario he costs them £5m-£8m and they sell him for £7.5m. If thats the case he's had a storming season for them and its just the equivalent of a loan.
I should have guessed adult debate wasnt for you.If you had his sausage any further down your throat his balls would be resting on your chin
It’s a horrendous deal. There’s no way of them making money out of it. If he excels and is worth £15m+ City sign him back.How is it throwing money down the toilet?
Worst case scenario he costs them £5m-£8m and they sell him for £7.5m. If thats the case he's had a storming season for them and its just the equivalent of a loan.
I really dont get this argument? If it was a season long loan what would the difference be?It’s a horrendous deal. There’s no way of them making money out of it. If he excels and is worth £15m+ City sign him back.
Please stop slagging off everything on every thread, it’s all I see.
Because they’ve paid a sizeable transfer fee.I really dont get this argument? If it was a season long loan what would the difference be?
Some people don't half get embarrassed easily on here.People watch Douglas’ pockets like it’s their inheritance money he’s spending. It’s embarrassing
Nothing since what i posted the other day, man. I won't see him till Saturday at the match.@Jimmy87 you heard anything?
I think you’ll find the very obvious difference is that they’ve had to spaff a huge amount of money on a transfer fee and have to pay his wages. It’s basically a very, very expensive loan if all goes well and a waste of probably £10m if it doesn’t. Utter shite.I really dont get this argument? If it was a season long loan what would the difference be?
He's nowhere near as good as you and a few others are making out. He was good for us, average for Leicester and played in a Norwich side that conceded a shit load. We really shouldn't be getting involved in terrible deals like that for a bang average player.He’s a quality player, for £5m. People moaning that it’s like a loan, he would have added to our squad even if it was a loan.
People watch Douglas’ pockets like it’s their inheritance money he’s spending. It’s embarrassing
I'm not convinced we will get Woolfy unless he forces the issue. Ipswich seem very reluctant to let him go.Tbh we've still not lost anyone of worth which is really surprising to me as I thought at least one of the big boys would go.
If it is Woolfenden and Godo on top of what we have I think the squad is in a good place.
A really good window would be if you added the unknown 'wildcard' on top, which I still have a feeling for for some reason. Also could do with 2 or 3 fringe players moving on.
We have one slot left in the senior squad so we do need outgoings to make room.Tbh we've still not lost anyone of worth which is really surprising to me as I thought at least one of the big boys would go.
If it is Woolfenden and Godo on top of what we have I think the squad is in a good place.
A really good window would be if you added the unknown 'wildcard' on top, which I still have a feeling for for some reason. Also could do with 2 or 3 fringe players moving on.
They don’t want him to go but their manager said today that these things are never straight forward whatever that might mean. It appears to be widely thought that he has asked for a move which “might” explain McKennas wordsI'm not convinced we will get Woolfy unless he forces the issue. Ipswich seem very reluctant to let him go.
Depends how much he costs as wellThey don’t want him to go but their manager said today that these things are never straight forward whatever that might mean. It appears to be widely thought that he has asked for a move which “might” explain McKennas words
Good point !!!Depends how much he costs as well
The two lists "Cheap" and "Cheaper"This really has been a shit summer of transfers.
Still stuck with all our dead weight and signed only the bare essentials.
So much for ‘two lists of players’
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The two lists "Cheap" and "Cheaper"
nothing Wrong with keeping Allen, we’ll need himMakes extending contracts to Bidwell, Wilson and Allen look more and more crazy.
If it wasn’t around appearances and was around turning a profit, then it’s been a stupid exercise cause now we are stuck with them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol didn’t we bid a few millionAccording to Ipswich fans, the reported fee for Woolfenden is £14million
Bidwill was also automatic wasn't it? Hit a certain number of games and we had to.nothing Wrong with keeping Allen, we’ll need him
Tbh we've still not lost anyone of worth which is really surprising to me as I thought at least one of the big boys would go.
If it is Woolfenden and Godo on top of what we have I think the squad is in a good place.
A really good window would be if you added the unknown 'wildcard' on top, which I still have a feeling for for some reason. Also could do with 2 or 3 fringe players moving on.
Plus they have a buy back clause of £7m... along with a 100% sell on.According to Ipswich fans, the reported fee for Woolfenden is £14million
And which of these categories was Hughes in just for clarificationThe two lists "Cheap" and "Cheaper"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?