It's well and good saying the only way forward is for sisu to go, but they're not just going to leave though are they?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Exactly. "We've moved on..." - translated, "if we don't get the Ricoh for a song we'll be off, so we'll hold the club hostage in Northampton bluffing ACL about a phantom new ground for long enough to bankrupt them"
Not being funny, but elsewhere in this thread, I've bought attention to the quote from SISU when they were hit with a statuary demand in December 2012; in which they stated they were... "disappointed" by ACL's decision to issue a statutory demand, rather than "negotiate a level of rent which the club can afford and which is in line with the rent paid by other clubs"
Now they're saying they want nothing short of unencumbered freehold...
Now we produce a quote, barely a year old in which Fisher clearly states they've 'moved on' from the Ricoh, and are focussed on their new stadium. Followed by Labovich now telling us the Ricoh is their preferred option.
People are quick to jump on CCC's claimed about-turn on this claimed deal to help ACL become distressed to the detriment of the Yorkshire Bank; but strangely quiet with regards the rather confused narrative from SISU senior figures. And one is conjecture, the other statements in the pubic domain...
Not being funny, but elsewhere in this thread, I've bought attention to the quote from SISU when they were hit with a statuary demand in December 2012; in which they stated they were... "disappointed" by ACL's decision to issue a statutory demand, rather than "negotiate a level of rent which the club can afford and which is in line with the rent paid by other clubs"
Now they're saying they want nothing short of unencumbered freehold...
Now we produce a quote, barely a year old in which Fisher clearly states they've 'moved on' from the Ricoh, and are focussed on their new stadium. Followed by Labovich now telling us the Ricoh is their preferred option.
People are quick to jump on CCC's claimed about-turn on this claimed deal to help ACL become distressed to the detriment of the Yorkshire Bank; but strangely quiet with regards the rather confused narrative from SISU senior figures. And one is conjecture, the other statements in the pubic domain...
Freudian slip.... discuss...?
Freudian slip.... discuss...?
Next time ccfc way makes his usual contribution - namely pie money, teams in 6th don't get promoted or pie money - ill just say to him "well dear fruit I do think this forum may be of a far too challenging nature for someone of your intellectual limitations. Why not put the kettle on and make a pot if tea for the adults in the room. Two sugars in mine dear boy" Is that nicer?
Come on, you're splitting hairs...
I make all my statements in the pubic domain.
Too funny..... that's quality silverware? I hope you "tipped" the waitress?
So it was a great success getting rid of Sisu and replacing them with Otium then?
Would you say that that the attempted "coup" by ACL to try and force out Sisu for their more favoured owners, by instigating(though not actually completing it due to Sisu just beating them to it) administration, which resulted in the deduction of 20 points over two seasons, and us playing 35 miles away from home was a good result then?
cant answer because you know you are in the wrong.
CLOSE THREAD
4 points off the play offs dickhead.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?