2½ times our points deduction in the last 8 weeks. (2 Viewers)

Forums New posts
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
stupot07 said:
It's well and good saying the only way forward is for sisu to go, but they're not just going to leave though are they?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
Click to expand...

Says you. :p
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
spider_ricoh said:
Exactly. "We've moved on..." - translated, "if we don't get the Ricoh for a song we'll be off, so we'll hold the club hostage in Northampton bluffing ACL about a phantom new ground for long enough to bankrupt them"
Click to expand...

It's not hard, is it? That statement was printed on 24th May, 2013. Are we being told he didn't mean it? If so, what's the basis of the move to Northampton?
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Not being funny, but elsewhere in this thread, I've bought attention to the quote from SISU when they were hit with a statuary demand in December 2012; in which they stated they were... "disappointed" by ACL's decision to issue a statutory demand, rather than "negotiate a level of rent which the club can afford and which is in line with the rent paid by other clubs"

Now they're saying they want nothing short of unencumbered freehold...

Now we produce a quote, barely a year old in which Fisher clearly states they've 'moved on' from the Ricoh, and are focussed on their new stadium. Followed by Labovich now telling us the Ricoh is their preferred option.

People are quick to jump on CCC's claimed about-turn on this claimed deal to help ACL become distressed to the detriment of the Yorkshire Bank; but strangely quiet with regards the rather confused narrative from SISU senior figures. And one is conjecture, the other statements in the pubic domain...
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Not being funny, but elsewhere in this thread, I've bought attention to the quote from SISU when they were hit with a statuary demand in December 2012; in which they stated they were... "disappointed" by ACL's decision to issue a statutory demand, rather than "negotiate a level of rent which the club can afford and which is in line with the rent paid by other clubs"

Now they're saying they want nothing short of unencumbered freehold...

Now we produce a quote, barely a year old in which Fisher clearly states they've 'moved on' from the Ricoh, and are focussed on their new stadium. Followed by Labovich now telling us the Ricoh is their preferred option.

People are quick to jump on CCC's claimed about-turn on this claimed deal to help ACL become distressed to the detriment of the Yorkshire Bank; but strangely quiet with regards the rather confused narrative from SISU senior figures. And one is conjecture, the other statements in the pubic domain...
Click to expand...

No it's not funny! SISU are full of shit.
 
ohitsaidwalker king power

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Not being funny, but elsewhere in this thread, I've bought attention to the quote from SISU when they were hit with a statuary demand in December 2012; in which they stated they were... "disappointed" by ACL's decision to issue a statutory demand, rather than "negotiate a level of rent which the club can afford and which is in line with the rent paid by other clubs"

Now they're saying they want nothing short of unencumbered freehold...

Now we produce a quote, barely a year old in which Fisher clearly states they've 'moved on' from the Ricoh, and are focussed on their new stadium. Followed by Labovich now telling us the Ricoh is their preferred option.

People are quick to jump on CCC's claimed about-turn on this claimed deal to help ACL become distressed to the detriment of the Yorkshire Bank; but strangely quiet with regards the rather confused narrative from SISU senior figures. And one is conjecture, the other statements in the pubic domain...
Click to expand...

Freudian slip.... discuss...? ;)
 
ccfcway

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Next time ccfc way makes his usual contribution - namely pie money, teams in 6th don't get promoted or pie money - ill just say to him "well dear fruit I do think this forum may be of a far too challenging nature for someone of your intellectual limitations. Why not put the kettle on and make a pot if tea for the adults in the room. Two sugars in mine dear boy" Is that nicer?
Click to expand...

yer, beacuse its me always going on about match day revenues, SISU have hardly mentioned it !
 
davebart

davebart

Active Member
lordsummerisle said:
So it was a great success getting rid of Sisu and replacing them with Otium then?

Would you say that that the attempted "coup" by ACL to try and force out Sisu for their more favoured owners, by instigating(though not actually completing it due to Sisu just beating them to it) administration, which resulted in the deduction of 20 points over two seasons, and us playing 35 miles away from home was a good result then?
Click to expand...

I'm not prepared to answer that because you keep changing the topic of discussion.

I could ask you whether you think the owners, and only the owners, did very well out of the administration process. Successfully transfering the golden share. ditching a longterm rental agreement that they broke unilaterally. writing off millions of pounds of debt that they had loaded the company with. But I'm not going to.
 
davebart

davebart

Active Member
covcity4life said:
cant answer because you know you are in the wrong.

CLOSE THREAD
Click to expand...

I presume the difference between can't and won't is lost on you.

And I can't be wrong because everything I have said is true.

I'm glad your support of the club is unquestioning. It is heartwarming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top