Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

11k (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Specs WT-R75
  • Start date Sep 19, 2015
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #106
SlowerThanPlatt said:
Birmingham v Forest - 16,000. Birmingham population = 1.1m. Granted, there's Villa, so halve it you get 550,000.

And, by the way, the population of Wigan is 317,000. For some strange reason pundits go along with 'Little Wigan from a small town, incredible what they've done'. Here's the link from the government. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...-of-the-north-west/censusnorthwestnr0712.html

Doncaster is another - 302,000 according to the government. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...-of-the-north-west/censusnorthwestnr0712.html
Click to expand...

It seems Armybike has based his figures on Wikipedia, which can be innaccurate.

Buisness Doncaster had the population as 290K in 2010, so the 302k figure seems pretty spot on, and they could only muster just over 5,000 fans.

I was still dissapointed with our crowd though, but consistency will bring the fans back.
 
A

armybike

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #107
SlowerThanPlatt said:
Birmingham v Forest - 16,000. Birmingham population = 1.1m. Granted, there's Villa, so halve it you get 550,000.

And, by the way, the population of Wigan is 317,000. For some strange reason pundits go along with 'Little Wigan from a small town, incredible what they've done'. Here's the link from the government. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...-of-the-north-west/censusnorthwestnr0712.html

Doncaster is another - 302,000 according to the government. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...-of-the-north-west/censusnorthwestnr0712.html
Click to expand...

You're making reference to the Metropolitan Boroughs population and not that of the actual home town/city population.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #108
SlowerThanPlatt said:
Birmingham v Forest - 16,000. Birmingham population = 1.1m. Granted, there's Villa, so halve it you get 550,000.

And, by the way, the population of Wigan is 317,000. For some strange reason pundits go along with 'Little Wigan from a small town, incredible what they've done'. Here's the link from the government. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...-of-the-north-west/censusnorthwestnr0712.html

Doncaster is another - 302,000 according to the government. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...-of-the-north-west/censusnorthwestnr0712.html
Click to expand...

No it isn't - the actual towns are tiny. The government figures are for the borough, Doncaster in the last census was 67,000 I think.

If you are going on the borough argument you need to factor in Nuneaton, Bedworth, Stratford, leamington etc - everyone in the Cv postcodes and are population I believe escalates to something ridiculous like 600 - 700,000.

Wiki is correct;

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Borough_of_Doncaster

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Borough_of_Wigan

Wigan again as a town is small. Bigger than Nuneaton but not by much.
 
S

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #109
on that basis Millwall is in london which has a population of 10million+
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #110
I'm going of what the government has published which I believe is accurate as they have no reason to lie.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #111
skybluesam66 said:
on that basis Millwall is in london which has a population of 10million+
Click to expand...

http://millwall.localstats.co.uk/census-demographics/england/london/tower-hamlets/millwall
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #112
Really on the fence with this one.

On the one hand we had the highest attendance in league one yesterday and league one being the key point here. It's division 3 football and when we have had all the troubles in the past 4 years with a relegation and Northampton (not to be underestimated and seems forgotten by many) it's a great attendance.

On the other hand it's our only game at the Ricoh in September on a lovely day for that matter and it's the best start for years. We have an exciting team and the best manager in the league and we work on a more fans that turn up the better basis. Self sufficient.

I guess the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
 
A

armybike

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #113
SlowerThanPlatt said:
I'm going of what the government has published which I believe is accurate as they have no reason to lie.
Click to expand...

Yep, that's fine if you want to quote the population of the Metropolitan Borough and not that of the actual towns.

I'm guessing when Coventry joins the West Midlands Combined Authority people will flood to CCFC games from Wolverhampton, Brum, Solihull etc, so seems like a fair barometer!
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #114
Grendel said:
No it isn't - the actual towns are tiny. The government figures are for the borough, Doncaster in the last census was 67,000 I think.

If you are going on the borough argument you need to factor in Nuneaton, Bedworth, Stratford, leamington etc - everyone in the Cv postcodes and are population I believe escalates to something ridiculous like 600 - 700,000.

Wiki is correct;

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Borough_of_Doncaster

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Borough_of_Wigan

Wigan again as a town is small. Bigger than Nuneaton but not by much.
Click to expand...

I must admit I don't know much about this subject. However, for the Midlands, the government do not count Bedworth and Nuneaton for Coventry nor do they count Dudley separate for Birmingham.

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...he-west-midlands/censuswestmidlandnr0712.html

As you know everything, more than the government, can you explain why?
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #115
armybike said:
Yep, that's fine if you want to quote the population of the Metropolitan Borough and not that of the actual towns.

I'm guessing when Coventry joins the West Midlands Combined Authority people will flood to CCFC games from Wolverhampton, Brum, Solihull etc, so seems like a fair barometer!
Click to expand...

It's not me quoting anything. The government are the ones who have posted this online and believe it to be correct.
 
A

armybike

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #116
SlowerThanPlatt said:
As you know everything, more than the government, can you explain why?
Click to expand...

Because (sigh) Coventry and Birmingham aren't currently in Metropolitan Boroughs.

When the West Midlands Combined Authority forms, do you believe the population of Coventry will increase to several millions, as you'd need to add all the other towns/citys in?
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #117
It seems the 300k figure includes surrounding villages

The Metropolitan Borough of Wigan is a metropolitan borough of Greater Manchester, in North West England. It is named after its largest component town and former county borough, Wigan and includes the towns and villages of Leigh, part of Ashton-in-Makerfield, Ince-in-Makerfield, Hindley, Orrell, Standish, Atherton, Tyldesley, Golborne, Lowton, Billinge, Astley, Haigh and Aspull.

So when it says 300k, it includes all these villages and towns as well in the population count.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 20, 2015
  • #118
SlowerThanPlatt said:
I must admit I don't know much about this subject. However, for the Midlands, the government do not count Bedworth and Nuneaton for Coventry nor do they count Dudley separate for Birmingham.

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/mro/n...he-west-midlands/censuswestmidlandnr0712.html

As you know everything, more than the government, can you explain why?
Click to expand...

Because the borough is effectively the West Midlands includes Birmingham at its 2.8 million.

We were separated from Warwickshire in the 70's but their population is 560,000 so our borough really is 800,000

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warwickshire

The borough I've linked to shows the towns including Doncaster that make up the total population of the borough. Doncaster is tiny. It's like those people who look at Wikipedia that shows Wakefield at over 300,000 - it's the borough. The actual town is small.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #119
SlowerThanPlatt said:
It's not me quoting anything. The government are the ones who have posted this online and believe it to be correct.
Click to expand...

Look up Borough in the dictionary - the government are at one with me on this.

Here are the towns. They are a bit bigger than I thought but as I said around the size of Nuneaton

http://lovemytown.co.uk/Populations/TownsTable1.asp
 
Last edited: Sep 21, 2015

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #120
Kingokings204 said:
Really on the fence with this one.

On the one hand we had the highest attendance in league one yesterday and league one being the key point here. It's division 3 football and when we have had all the troubles in the past 4 years with a relegation and Northampton (not to be underestimated and seems forgotten by many) it's a great attendance.

On the other hand it's our only game at the Ricoh in September on a lovely day for that matter and it's the best start for years. We have an exciting team and the best manager in the league and we work on a more fans that turn up the better basis. Self sufficient.

I guess the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
Click to expand...


Yeah, but we didn't have an exciting team last week and put in an inept performance. Like it or not, that does have an impact foe some fans. Had we beaten Scunthorpe last week and played exciting football, we most certainly would have had a bigger crowd on Saturday.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #121
Yes we have an exciting team at the moment and it's great fun winning but some people will always have a dislike for the owner and that will keep them away rightly or wrongly.

things are going well at the moment which is normally a sign for one of the pair of arseholes that run the club to come and and shove their great big foot in their mouth both have been very quiet recently I s it because they are saying nothing or nobody is listening to them.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #122
Terry Gibson's perm said:
Yes we have an exciting team at the moment and it's great fun winning but some people will always have a dislike for the owner and that will keep them away rightly or wrongly.

things are going well at the moment which is normally a sign for one of the pair of arseholes that run the club to come and and shove their great big foot in their mouth both have been very quiet recently I s it because they are saying nothing or nobody is listening to them.
Click to expand...

Or that the on field excitement is nicely masking the off field problems for them.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #123
Otis said:
Or that the on field excitement is nicely masking the off field problems for them.
Click to expand...

Maybe but that pair can normally rise above such trivial matters as good form to make their non important information/bull shit heard.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #124
It's an old chestnut, I know, but it's valid; if we drew a big team in the cup the place would be packed and CWR would have constant phone calls from people: "have supported City all my life and I couldn't get a ticket, it ain't fair", etc etc

Last season the arguments on here seemed to be that people wouldn't attend because the football was shit or it was too expensive. Well, we've crossed those two off the list and people still won't attend.

11K on Saturday was rubbish.

Bob Latchford said:
The fans have to be won back. That's the key point ! and will it happen with our current owners at the helm ? there are thousands who won't because of them . it was even said on the Friday night phone in, certain fans simply refuse to return until they're gone .
Click to expand...
 

I_Saw_Shaw_Score

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #125
torchomatic said:
It's an old chestnut, I know, but it's valid; if we drew a big team in the cup the place would be packed and CWR would have constant phone calls from people: "have supported City all my life and I couldn't get a ticket, it ain't fair", etc etc

Last season the arguments on here seemed to be that people wouldn't attend because the football was shit or it was too expensive. Well, we've crossed those two off the list and people still won't attend.

11K on Saturday was rubbish.
Click to expand...

Agree with that I was very very close to not renewing my ST and my plan would have been to give it 5/6 games to see how this season started but I would have looked a right idiot now having enjoyed the 4 home games more than any (Gillingham game excluded) last season.

The pace and domination of Saturday was a joy to behold, yes I know it probably won't happen every week but to know we have it in our locker is fantastic!

I feel for the fans that aren't going but have yet sat through the dire crap ( the Dennis Wise half a season excluded & anyone that got to see Wilson & Clarke at 6F) of the last decade!
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #126
I would say that I have already liked this season so far than the whole of last season.

How many exciting games did we have last year? How many times did we break at pace and have people out of their seats in anticipation? How many times did we look capable of hammering teams?
 
S

SonofErnie

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #127
Terry Gibson's perm said:
Yes we have an exciting team at the moment and it's great fun winning but some people will always have a dislike for the owner and that will keep them away rightly or wrongly.

things are going well at the moment which is normally a sign for one of the pair of arseholes that run the club to come and and shove their great big foot in their mouth both have been very quiet recently I s it because they are saying nothing or nobody is listening to them.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't believe that it has a great deal to do with the owners at the moment. Whilst the current form and standard of football is admittedly encouraging, it's not yet sustained enough to entice a whole swathe of support back to the Ricoh. The fans have been let down and disappointed over decades and a run of eight games, however positive, isn't yet sustained enough. If the team replicate this form over the next 8, 16, 24 games then I think we will see attendances gradually creeping up, with the opportunity for them to hit 15k+ towards the back end of the season. In fact, if a top 2 challenge is maintained then we could see 20k in the last few games.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #128
SonofErnie said:
I honestly don't believe that it has a great deal to do with the owners at the moment. Whilst the current form and standard of football is admittedly encouraging, it's not yet sustained enough to entice a whole swathe of support back to the Ricoh. The fans have been let down and disappointed over decades and a run of eight games, however positive, isn't yet sustained enough. If the team replicate this form over the next 8, 16, 24 games then I think we will see attendances gradually creeping up, with the opportunity for them to hit 15k+ towards the back end of the season. In fact, if a top 2 challenge is maintained then we could see 20k in the last few games.
Click to expand...

Tend to agree.

At the moment it's a pretty good run of form, and little else.

And we've had those in the past only to end up disappointed.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #129
attendences and atmosphere are still better than last year so not end of the world

i was surprised only 11k this week but still think if we are doing well come october then we can aim for 13k plus for shrews and blackpool games
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #130
The club basically died last year and you could argue it has for the last 15 years too. In the last 10 years we've only been losing support because of rubbish finishes and nothing to excite.

2006 - 21,280
2007 - 20,342 (DOWN)
2008 - 19,123 (DOWN)
2009 - 17,408 (DOWN)
2010 - 17,305 (DOWN)
2011 - 16,310 (DOWN)
2012 - 15,119 (DOWN)
2013 - 10,997 (DOWN)
2014 - 2,348 (DOWN)
2015 - 9,332 (DOWN ON 2013)
 
A

armybike

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #131
SlowerThanPlatt said:
The club basically died last year and you could argue it has for the last 15 years too. In the last 10 years we've only been losing support because of rubbish finishes and nothing to excite.

2006 - 21,280
2007 - 20,342 (DOWN)
2008 - 19,123 (DOWN)
2009 - 17,408 (DOWN)
2010 - 17,305 (DOWN)
2011 - 16,310 (DOWN)
2012 - 15,119 (DOWN)
2013 - 10,997 (DOWN)
2014 - 2,348 (DOWN)
2015 - 9,332 (DOWN ON 2013)
Click to expand...

I trust they're Government approved figures?!
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #132
SlowerThanPlatt said:
The club basically died last year and you could argue it has for the last 15 years too. In the last 10 years we've only been losing support because of rubbish finishes and nothing to excite.

2006 - 21,280
2007 - 20,342 (DOWN)
2008 - 19,123 (DOWN)
2009 - 17,408 (DOWN)
2010 - 17,305 (DOWN)
2011 - 16,310 (DOWN)
2012 - 15,119 (DOWN)
2013 - 10,997 (DOWN)
2014 - 2,348 (DOWN)
2015 - 9,332 (DOWN ON 2013)
Click to expand...

You have also got to factor in the impact of the new stadium and the general curiosity, as our average at highfield road the 2-3 seasons before in the 2nd tier were around 14-15k, so in some respects an element (not all of it) is the natural drop back down to pre-Ricoh attendance s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 
S

SonofErnie

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #133
covcity4life said:
attendences and atmosphere are still better than last year so not end of the world

i was surprised only 11k this week but still think if we are doing well come october then we can aim for 13k plus for shrews and blackpool games
Click to expand...

Prior to Saturday, it was 4 points from 4 games. 2 away defeats, an unconvincing home draw and one good performance (Burton away). Some would have seen that as a return to type, hence the impact on the attendance. Those fluctuations will continue until the team are solidly top 6 over 20+ games.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #134
The attendance will only move significantly come December/January if we are sitting in a similar position. if we get promoted it will be higher but not a major jump.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #135
Let's just all admit that Cov have the worst fans in the country.

Must be true most on here do nothing but slag off City fans at any opportunity.

We really don't deserve the amount we get, as we really have no appreciation for what we have been given.
PUSB
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #136
I disagree t hat the Southend result was "unconvincing". Our problem was that we underestimated them due to their league position and expected the game to be a pushover. It wasn't and they really came out fighting. They didn't give us any time on the ball at all and were snapping at our heels from the off. We never gave up and our fighting spirit was tremendous and fan power that night spurred the team to get the equaliser. The atmosphere for me was better than the Gillingham game. Tremendous.

SonofErnie said:
Prior to Saturday, it was 4 points from 4 games. 2 away defeats, an unconvincing home draw and one good performance (Burton away). Some would have seen that as a return to type, hence the impact on the attendance. Those fluctuations will continue until the team are solidly top 6 over 20+ games.
Click to expand...
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2015
  • #137
The atmosphere is far better now that we are all nearer together.
 

davebart

Active Member
  • Sep 25, 2015
  • #138
SlowerThanPlatt said:
I get that top level rugby is attractive with international players but where we these thousands watching rugby before Wasps came?
Click to expand...

I live in Bath. There are thousands go to see the Rugby that wouldn't dream of attending a footy match. They're not sports fans. They just like the atmosphere around Rugby games. You get a lot more women go.
 

davebart

Active Member
  • Sep 25, 2015
  • #139
letsallsingtogether said:
Let's just all admit that Cov have the worst fans in the country.
PUSB
Click to expand...

We'd have to go some to be worse than Bristol City fans.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 25, 2015
  • #140
torchomatic said:
I disagree t hat the Southend result was "unconvincing". Our problem was that we underestimated them due to their league position and expected the game to be a pushover. It wasn't and they really came out fighting. They didn't give us any time on the ball at all and were snapping at our heels from the off. We never gave up and our fighting spirit was tremendous and fan power that night spurred the team to get the equaliser. The atmosphere for me was better than the Gillingham game. Tremendous.
Click to expand...

Our problem was that we missed a penalty and found a keeper in great form. The fans who actually turned up would recognise this.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?