Search results

  1. Jim

    Ipswich

  2. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    So the ref that gave us the penalty and didn’t call the goal offside…?
  3. Jim

    Watch along

    Fuck the bed! 😂
  4. Jim

    Media Reaction to FA Cup Semi Final

    You’re still a prick.
  5. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Now if I were trying to generate an accurate measure to the nearest centimetre that would be a perfect point. I’m not though. I’m trying to show that messiahs claim of a foot onside is clearly incorrect and therefore the assumption and the margin of error created by that assumption is perfectly...
  6. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    I’m not betting my life though. I’m proving that messiahs claim of a foot onside is nonsense. For that to not be true the pitch would have to look like it was mowed by a child on a sugar high.
  7. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    I’ll also add - take a look at any photo of the Wembley pitch over the years. The accuracy of the grass pattern is spot on.
  8. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    The same operation that marks out the pitch…. Or do we think the lines are all out of kilter too?
  9. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    The point was to show that the earlier claim of Wright being a foot onside was clearly nonsense. The mow lines would have to be way out for that to be true. And let’s not forget these same ground men are also marking out the pitch lines. The result I gained is virtually identical to the...
  10. Jim

    Media Reaction to FA Cup Semi Final

    I genuinely forgot he was even playing he was that non-existent.
  11. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    You’re either trolling or genuinely this stupid and I’m not sure which is worse.
  12. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Do you and reality speak often?
  13. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    FML Drawing the lines to a vanishing point allows you to correct for perspective. It’s evident you haven’t a clue what you’re talking about. Presumably these rails aren’t parallel either according to your logic….
  14. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    It’s almost like VAR is capable of understanding perspective. That’s why you’ll always see the lines drawn to vanishing points. The debate is that you said it’s a fact that there’s a conspiracy. And I’ve shown that the only issue here is that you don’t understand perspective and that your...
  15. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Let’s go through this very slowly….. The red lines are drawn parallel to the grass mowing lines. The assumption here is that the groundsman has mowed close to parallel to the goal lines or perpendicular to the sidelines. Not too much a stretch given it’s the national stadium and the ground...
  16. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Off course the gap between the yellow and blue lines get bigger as it comes across. It’s called perspective. Look at the size of the light green shade of grass. See how that gets bigger too. Perspective. Is there a massive conspiracy against Coventry city or does MessiahRobins simply not...
  17. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Not a foot onside…..
  18. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Sorry but you’re making yourself look like a fool if you can’t understand perspective.
  19. Jim

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    The referee could have easily decided that the arm was in an unnatural position, ball to arm etc.
Top