Search results

If they avoid filing holdings accounts everyone will understandably assume criminal behaviour has taken place. I'm not saying it has but everyone will assume that.

of course they could but it wouldn't have happened, it wouldn't break the lease so what would be the benefit?, it would be cheaper to have paid what they owed to ACL instead of having to pay an administrator. Proper bids could have come in for the club, people would have known what they were...

This "event" is not in any way a protest, it's going to watch the game on what is likely a bigger screen than most people have at home with some fellow fans while raising a little money for charity, nothing wrong with that in the slightest, but it's not a protest, it isn't making peoples...

yes they would but if the players and the lease and golden share were all in the same place what happened couldn't have happened.

and had the whole club been in administration and it been conducted properly it would have done.

a vast difference but les reid can't seem to tell, any constructive criticism is responded too in the same way as if we'd kicked him in the balls and insulted his mum. There is no question that les reid has received some unfair and over the top abuse like pretty much everyone in the public eye...

you can't possibly belive that, we are playing in northampton losing 200kish per game more than we would be if we were paying 400k rent at the ricoh, this continues despite how obviously and utterly absurd it is, how can you possibly think sisu have learnt from their mistakes?

There is the chance we could have gotten liquidated but it's a very small chance and the chance of us being liquidated now is probably higher. So you can say it's a guess what would have happened all you like (even though other clubs suggest it would have been much more preferable to the slow...

It's not a fact that we would have been better off by now without sisu of course but it is as I said almost certain based on whats happen to similar clubs in similar situations, it is a fact they they rescued us at the 11th hour and I supported them at the time and was grateful for it at the...

why? it's almost certain we'd have been better off if they hadn't taken us over, not for the first or second year perhaps but from then on.

The worst that can happen is sisu liquidate Otium and Arvo get the stadium due to haveing a charge over Otium, of course if sisu paid market value for the stadium this wouldn't be their plan but presumably they are not willing to pay market value.

I agree with alot of that but the problem is if you don't get enough numbers the plan is harmful not helpful and the fact the organisation has been so haphazard and the fact the media and nopm have fallen out there is almost no hope of success. The smarter option is to say we are having a mass...

The spelling error is clearly part of the joke.

It is a step in the right direction though a very small step, without fixing the much more important issues though it's nearly irrelevant anyone who isn't giving sisu a penny more doesn't have a great need for a shop either. When the more important issue gets sorted (ie getting us back in...

they can't even get this right, close the barrow weeks before opening the store but thats ok they suggest people use the website which doesn't work to buy tickets or use the phone they don't answer.

There is zero chance of the pack the stadium and leave protest working, you are relying on thousands of people to believe it will work, to spend hours of their time, to give some money to people whom they don't think should be given any money and then after thats happened they have to leave the...

The moderation here is so mild we really don't have to worry that Nick might not agree with us. You really have to be a class A cock to get banned from here and be really nasty to have a post deleted, there is no evidence at all (quite the opposite infact) that Nick is deleting posts he doesn't...

Completely agree he however doesn't handle it properly weather its constructive or not, he went off on me in the past for suggesting the grilling of fisher should have included questioning fishers responses even though the rest of my message said how much I appreciated his work and that he was...

yes I know he has had some abusive tweets which isn't right but he is supposed to be a professional and he has lost that lately, Especially as criticism of his "grillings" of Joy Seppala and Fisher in the past is fair when it's done constructively. Clearly he is in a hard position if he was...

have you been reading the tweets? he's made multiple tweets calling for michael to resign. when he received much less harsh criticism than that and much more constructive criticism, he goes nuts.