Search results

It's of course incredibly difficult to prove who is more objective than someone else, you can only point to situations where someone clearly isn't being objective. Which is incredably easy to do with the people I mentioned. My position in this thread is that what he did was wrong and his...

yes but it happens infrequently enough that clubs don't need to show they are on top of the problem and the courts punishment is deterrent enough.

Yes he got Cyrus booked and not only was he not wearing a sisu out shirt he wasn't wearing a shirt at all. What this guys punishment was should put an end to any question on weather sisu are being spiteful. If this guys ban was the same then they presumably aren't, if this guys punishment (for a...

Now what could the club do to put an end to it? oh I know, MOVE BACK TO COVENTRY!!!

having a sisu out shirt on would mitigate some of the slightly more serious bit yes because then hes doing it for a valid reason not because he was being an ass. Doing it as a valid protest is absolutely an extenuating circumstance that will be taken into account by the courts, it won't and...

I wouldn't this beered up chav should be judged and punished by the courts too, his punishment should be slightly more serious though.

It is a crime, he shouldn't have done it and he should be punished, everyone has agreed on that, including me, multiple times in this thread so I'm not sure why you insist on repeating it. However do you know who enforces the law? it's not sisu, it's the police and the courts and they should be...

I've made my feelings on the matter quite clear in this thread and they don't even in the slightest resemble ' I think it's ok to run onto the pitch' but lets be clear the law he broke absolutely is as I described it, it's an exceptionally minor crime as long as you don't follow it up with any...

Of course but we know what law he's breaking the one of you may not run onto a piece of grass and postpone a kick about for 2 minutes.

They probably will you are right because as we have seen the league are either clueless or corrupt, we all know there was no enforced eviction yet the league have acted like thats exactly what happened. Admittedly you have also acted like thats what happened, so it's not just the league who are...

maybe if you actually made your point for once instead of dressing it up in either a vague, cryptic or insulting short comment you'd have to post alot less often. You are correct they won't have to sell, but he is correct in that the squad will likely be reduced in quality because of it. We all...

how did you get around it? I assumed you had used white text or something but it doesn't look like it, or does it not apply in certain browsers?

a message has to be at least 10 characters in length. so if you go to the quick reply section and type no and press quick reply you will get an error message, so people add the words 10 char to a short message to hit the 10 character minimum.

SISU are the only people to blame for how much worse things are today than 12months ago. They don't take full responsibility for everything but they sure as hell take responsibility for the last 12 months.

I'm sure thats a significant reason, though alot of it is also culture and demographic changes too, but I'm not for a second suggesting people shouldn't be punished, just that the punishment be fair and consistent with those who commit similar crimes. If he gets banned for more time than the guy...

if we don't none of us are going to be going to Coventry games in a few years, but thats another thread.

In what way? football seems much more friendly and unfortunately a little sterile compared to how it was when I was younger, it's got more family friendly, safer, I remember fights in the disabled section between the west end and the away fans. I've not seen anything like that for years...

Have things escalated or is football the safest it's ever been? because it feels like the later to me

but the courts won't decide because coventry city have banned him indefinitely, so what the courts decide is going to be irrelevant to him watching his team, of course you'd hope when we got new owners they would rescind the banning order once any banning order is up from the courts.

no they probably won't as you can see from other punishments from the courts from much more serious and much less understandable breakings of that rule. He will likely get a short ban and small fine, perhaps just the fine. He absolutely should be punished to the same level other similar acts...