Search results

Coventry United?

It must have been more propaganda from the "Council Evening Telegraph" they're solely responsible for everything that's wrong with the club don't you know.

To be fair this thread is more entertaining than the average City game and like our team no one really knows what's going on.

Because at the time of the FOI's there had been no meeting, the meeting only happened last month if my understanding is correct.

Who's Les Dennis? Who's Mavis? Wasn't trying to be funny. I assumed that's what you were doing with this thread. Funny thing is though now that it's clear you were being serious it just got a whole lot funnier.

That's the most plausible theory yet.

But why?

You forgot that they've stopped covering city games and covering city good news stories plus they didn't cover the people who represent the majority of fans putting the smallest fans groups (I'm sure the SBT only has two members) right on how great SISU are at the SCG (I'm sure that's what the...

This is the best thread ever. Well done Grendull. Next time there's a "non-story" in the "council evening telegraph" that you don't like after the initial thread has disappeared can you start a second thread again just to keep the focus on it? Perhaps you could bump up the original thread again...

What ever drew you to that conclusion given that I said "non-story" twice, first time I pointed out in brackets that they're your words and the second time I put it in quote marks. Well done in bumping up YOUR "non-story" thread again. The irony of you going out your way to keep it at the top...

Isn't all of Grendulls post pulled out of thin air? This should be his natural habitat ;)

I think it was suggested that we could have a Q & A session on here with the SCG but nothing came of it so I thought we could have a thread of questions anyway, I'm sure someone from the SCG must at least look in on here occasionally so I got thinking we could have a thread anyway. Post a...

He probably shouldn't have started a second thread on a non-story (Grendulls own words) with a question. It was bound to lead to further questions. The irony being he's done a very good job of keeping this "non-story" going.

I don't think anyone really knows (including you) what YOUR thread is supposed to be about so it's easy to see why you're being accused of deflection.

They've proved that all by themselves, they don't need anyone on here's help with that one.

I would if we were in the top flight. What I wouldn't be doing is going as often.

No answer for this then? Can't say I'm surprised.

You have an inside track. Should I not swallow the story about Jaguar investing in Whitley then? Especially as the award winning journalist didn't cover it?

Do you really not see the irony in what you're doing?

Like I tell you everytime you come out with with that idiotic line. That's your fantasy not mine.