Search results

I think you may well have hit the nail squarely on the head. If she does recognise this what's the chances of her recognising that she has the wrong 2 people at the helm to make this little bit of success happen?

This thread gets funnier and funnier.

I've been busy in the garden erecting a fence. My mistake, that wont make sense to you as you only talk in synonyms. Try this. I've been raising a rampart in the allotment. Better?

That must be why I always get advert's for Russian brides come up on this site if I don't login ;)

Yeah but Grendull only works in synonyms. He thinks it should have been a story about SP bribing the random drug testers in football. He read the headline as Steven Pressley in forensic risk over cash after his discharge. Clearly the story was about something else, hence its spurious.

Who's Bobby Davro?

I've just re-read your opening post and I understand now. It was a letter of complaint about an advert for trick cow shit that flashes up online when you read the SP article. Spurious Bullshit (false cowpat) it was so obvious. Boy do I feel silly.

:pointlaugh: Thanks Grendull. That really cheered me up.

Even I'm getting embarrassed for you now. Were you off school the day they taught you how to use a thesaurus? Of course you can use spurious as an alternative to misleading but what you're supposed to do next is look up in a dictionary the synonym for it's exact meaning so you don't use that...

Indeed. The second synonym on the list is "false". Which brings me back to my original question. What part of the article was false? Spurious may well be a synonym for the word misleading but you used the word spurious in your OP not misleading. The meaning of the word "misleading" is tending...

How ironic that your misinterpreted meaning of the word spurious is itself spurious. From the Cambridge online dictionary Spurious (adjective) False and not what it appears to be, or (of reasons and judgements) based on something that has not been correctly understood and therfore...

What do you think spurious means? I'm asking for myself. If astute or mart have any questions for you I'm sure they'll ask you themselves.

Perhaps you could explain what of the original article was false then?

Most definitely.

Which indeed was the story. A point missed by you and Grendull. The clue was there all along, it's called a headline.

I thought the mysterons was captain scarlet?

At that point in time nothing. Much the same as it cost Leicester nothing. No doubting that our problems started with Richardson but I have to agree with (and this is going to hurt ;) ) Grendull on this one. Richardson would have put us in admin, it would have been the best thing to do for the...

From what I've seen our approach to the way we play has gone from negative to positive. Most elements of our game are much the same, we're keeping the ball on the ground and trying to play a high tempo passing game. The big difference being that the ball is spending alot more time now heading in...

I'm sure if there was a good business case for the new stadium SISU would have produced it by now if not at the very first mention of a new stadium. The fact that they havent tells you everything that you need to know, the fact that we are 2 years into the project and someone has only just been...

You mean like SISU with the new stadium as apposed to making a sensible offer for the Ricoh?