Search results

The best form of 'protest would be to attend CRFC the same weekend and any other weekend.

Zzzzzzz let's be honest it is a complete irrelevance what he says to the press.

Do you think so? I don't tbf hence why we concede Sunday league style goals every week

Not sure why he waited 10 minutes after the LO goal to make a change. Fuck me just go for it.

We're desperately bad at defending crosses (well not just crosses). Deary fucking me.

Sorry, my post really means found.

Jack: "Absolutely no chance of any change in my anti SISU ignore the football rhetoric" :wave:

No. They claimed it illegal state aid because a private investor wouldn't. The evidence they put forward from an expert wasn't permitted by the judge however. Whether that same evidence would be seen as new a second time who knows.

No. It's a bit more subtle than that - there is a recognition that some private investors might and some might not. The judge isn't making that direct judgement. Hence why the evidence SISU submitted that basically outlined why a private investor wouldn't make the loan wasn't considered.

Wonder whether Wasps sought investors to buy out the loan?

It'd be interesting to see what the repayment terms of the remainder of the loan are. Assume the 'small profit' has been written off.....

The justification for protecting the council's long term asset looks a bit off now they've sold it.

They had a party willing to do a deal with them.

Had a quick look at his Twitter. He's even less articulate than average and still looks to be out on the piss on the regular. At least at Cov there isn't anywhere decent to go on the piss.

I don't think it's understandable as they've never outlined the reasons for it.

I'm surprised they never had sight of the JV agreement in previous negotiations.

Only the council have sold their stake so far. Nothing to do with the exclusivity agreement. Does it show that the council never wanted a deal with CCFC?

The council didn't need to sell their stake in ACL. You and others parrotted that sort of line gleefully cos it meant nasty hedge fund wouldn't get the community asset. CCFC were an irrelevance as the Ricoh had a full order book. Turnover had trebled. Now you decide that the council HAD to...

What on earth does that have to do with it?