Search results

I don't think it was cheek. It's a CCFC related thread on a CCFC forum and in no shape or form was my question leading to anything Wasps related. Mays if's and buts is all we have almost two years on and you want to talk about what wasps may or may not be doing. It was a pretty simple question...

I was asking about CCFC and SISU. Wasps have sweet FA to do with my question but 10 out of 10 for the attempted diversion. Tim will be proud of you.

I was asking about CCFC and SISU. Wasps have sweet FA to do with my question but 10 out of 10 for the attempted diversion.

If you're refering to the SW statement I'd argue it could also be a pre-runner to a "we did everthing we could, we've been quite clear in our desire to retain TM's services" type of statement. Lets hope you're right.

How much are SISU and their investors going to charge us for that and where is the money going to come from? 2 very simple questions you would have thought TF would have answered from the out set, yet nearly 2 years on...

I think the site in it's entirety has already been ruled out as a large housing complex due to access issues although a much smaller housing development on part of the site has got the go-ahead I believe.

Hasn't TF already spoke of ten to twelve miles but if the ideal site is a couple of more miles it wouldn't be ruled out? So already we're up to fourteen miles.

Coventry gateway = Not happening Peugeot Ryton = Ruled out Brandon = Ruled out Ansty = Ruled out I'm really struggling to think of another site that boarders Coventry that isn't a nature reserve of some kind. What's SISU's real angle for these meetings? Appease the FL? Leverage in a...

I hope I don't get the opportunity to prove you wrong. I'd rather have TM confirmed on a contract than point score but it isn't bullshit, utter or otherwise. It certainly wouldn't be the first time in the last couple of years where something has happened and I've thought no one will defend this...

They'll be some who rather than admit what's slapping them in the face will stretch an elaborate conspiracy theory to blame CCC, Higgs, Wasps, CET, previous managers, previous players, previous board members blah blah blah. There always is.

Remember. A hand shake means fuck all.

Depends on the news I would say. If it's good it could be as early as tomorrow. If it's bad don't be surprised if someone whisper's it on Friday when the whole country is preoccupied with election results. A good day to bury bad news and all that.

Reading the CT piece I would guess one of the following two scenarios is about to happen. 1) TM stays and SW and TF are at least on borrowed time but hopefully one if not both are gone. 2) TM goes, TF and SW stay, DH becomes first team manager. Seriously hope it's scenario 1.

SW goes and TM stays. That's a win win. If TF went too that would give us the best start of a season in donkeys years before a ball is even kicked.

I think you're right. All the parties are guilty of telling us what everyone else is going to do and not what they're going to do themselves. Which is a strange way of winning votes in my book.

The big difference between the current bunch and Tony Blair's bunch is the calibre of people set for positions in the cabinet. Tony Blair's first cabinet was probably the best labour cabinet ever put together (non better than Mo Mowlem of course), Ed Miliband's on the other hand is set to be...

Either that or the labour PR machine is as bad as SISU's ;)

If you say so.

If labour get in it will be a very weak labour government with an idiot for a leader. Rather than be in for year's we'll end up in the same mess that the last labour government left the country in and we'll have to vote a conservative government in again to make the tough but necessary decisions...

Enjoy the summer. Had the first BBQ of the year today. Go and watch some motorsport of the four wheeled variety and go on holiday.