Search results

So its only about the last touch before it goes in the back of the net. I always thought he had more to his game than that. What were the rest of his stats like? Was he still contributing more than anyone else in the team? You've also conveniently forgotten that mouse went AWOL, sorry was...

See my post above yours for a reply.

He was injured for a large part of the season after Clarke left but was getting back into form once he regained match fitness towards the end of the season so once again you're talking shit.

There's every possibility we wouldn't have been in a relegation battle and been pushing for the play off place instead because not only would we have not tried replaced him with a bunch of has been pre-Madonnas we could have used the budget we used trying to replace him where it was really...

Exactly that. If he does develop well, tears this league a new A hole, we get promoted and then he tears a hole in the championship and a premier league team come's in for him at that point we might not only get something like proper money for him meaning some might actually get reinvested in...

He's very David Beckhamesk. Has a great eye for a pass too.

If nothing else we need to hold onto him to take penalties and set pieces.

What would be fair is that instead of selling these young players at the first chance so they can advance their careers without us why not hold onto them for a while longer so we stand a chance of advancing our club with them. Let's show the same ambition as our starlets.

The fans already paying the price for SISU's actions.

Not for the price SW and TF let him go for.

Yeah, SISU would never sell our playing assets. Looking forward to everyone on here acting like every other club in the league would sell him :slap:

They already have a payday loan company lending to CCFC. It's called ARVO I believe. All SISU have to work out now is how to get a payday out of CCFC. Give them another 7 years and they may have accidentally stumbled over one by then.

I'll take that as a yes ;)

One will have a hotel, conference facilities, exhibition space, a casino and restaurants etc. On it's door step, the other will be built by SISU. You're not wrong when you say we won't be in competition with them but not for the reason you outline. As for survival of the fittest, I wouldn't...

Asking would be a start. If you don't ask you don't get and we obviously need an extended deal because 2 years into a new stadium and Tims only just found the telephone number for a local authority.

Isn't our recovery stronger than theirs?

I must be bang in the button given your witty intellectual post. Congratulations on bringing SFA to the discussion.

Do you know what percentage it was of of people who actually voted? Surely that's the important figure here?

Is that 25% of the population or 25% of registered voters? 25% of the population probably isn't that bad when you consider how many people can't vote down to age or not being a UK citizen etc. Even if it's 25% of registered voters you still have to consider what percentage it is of the turnout.

At the end of the day when SISU exiled the club to Northampton they lost all control on what happened next at the Ricoh. If we'd never moved away I would seriously doubt that either A) Wasps came knocking in the first place, B) If they had it wouldn't have been considered or C) If it had of been...