Why not? It really demonstrates that virtually all of the budget goes to the manager, not really something to call SISU up on. I'd be more annoyed if there was a surplus of cash knocking about.
Yes. Kids younger than that are scouted now and contracted, I.e. Some kids aren't allowed to play any amateur football cos they're signed to a pro club
Nothing PC about wanting to minimise risk to people going about their daily lives. It's not as if it was spectators who know there is a certain level of risk.
You know such salient facts are irrelevant to Toni and Obtuse.
It's like criticising somebody for selling their (1984) Golf GTI for market value in 1994 then today complaining it was undersold.
History will show that the party that granted Wasps a 250 year lease to move from their historical home area is Coventry City Council. Forget half truths and silly quotes. That's it.
It's one of them. Always a struggle when you lose two players through injury. Hope Maddison isn't out for too long. 9 points from 4 games is promotion form.
Why would you pay millions for a share in a company that has a £35m bond to repay & annual interest payments of £7m + debt to their owner. What would 10% cost and at what point would we see a return?
Why can't some of you understand that the only party to blame in selling the Arena to Wasps is the one who sold it.
Coventry City Council sold it.
Coventry City Council extended the leasehold by 200 years to sell it
All the Mirror Group ones are the same. Choc full of advertising. Even once respected titles like the Manchester Evening News are running the '5 things you need to know about the price of fish' type features
Indeed, the estimated benefit is only partly linked to the local area. They mention travel which might mean international airlines, hardly of benefit to Coventry.
The chinless twat quoted in the article mentions 'celebrating Coventry's rich rugby history' or something but then mentions some team called Wasps playing a friendly. Presumably history only stretches back 8 months.