Search results

Now this would get my vote https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/07/24/2030-net-zero-petrol-car-ban-sunak-back-away/

Nothings really happened today but someone pretending to be outraged by a tweet - the reality is in a social media world political mud slinging will get increasing worse Starmer gets plenty of it from his own party members - ironically it’s the middle classes that will elect him along with...

She did of course in the end apologise

No she said they are a bunch of - she referred to the whole party as such. She then wouldn’t apologise unless genuine apologised himself for his personal behaviours - but her words were “The Tories are a bunch of….” Or do the media need to keep us as well...

Mr Johnson isn’t a bunch of people and if there is evidence then a crime has been committed and the police should investigate - do you agree with that?

Oh dear

So I assume if Mr Starmer had tweeted tories are racist homophobic and hate women this would be acceptable as there is apparently some truth in it?

1 - Boris Johnson is one man not a whole party 2 - has Mr Johnson been found guilty of any of these matters in a court of law?

There we have it

oh that wasn’t a tweet it was said to an audience and unlike this it’s literally her words Is this news to you?

Well oddly enough I wouldn’t have even known about it until you’ve highlighted it Not especially edifying but not really much different to the deputy labour leader calling Tories racist, misogynistic, homophobic scum - something I don’t think you were too outraged about at the time

Well that’s kind of my point

I thought it was more amusing than your twitter exclusive.

He may have now been released but played 60 times for Zwolle - part of the promotion winning team there

Kasteneer is playing in the second division isn’t he?

Well he was ahead of him last season and offered a contract so in all likelihood he will again

I doubt there will be many clubs challenging for the top 6 in the championship who would want Norton Cuffey - he'd be available if we want him as long as he gets sufficient game time

Not to me. Whats it doing for you? Here is the radical media landscape viewing on offer today https://www.tvguide.co.uk/mobile/channellisting.asp?ch=121#700045504

My point is it started as a public company - was not nationalised afterwards - and it was introduced when there were 3 channels as a means to offer an alternative, radical outlook I think 1980's TV is a bit different and limited versus 2023