Search results

Moussa and Christie have dropped very large hints they are off. Murphy says he wants to stay.

Read this a few times. Genuine question, whio is it that is "speaking the loudest", as i cant work it out. Is it SISU or CCC ?

not paranoid. If the above was the case, you'd just postpone the stock take ?. Not gonna lose any sleep over it, but its poor management.

well then, come out in the press and say "we really want Murphy to stay, we have offered hin the best terms we possibly can in this climate and we hope he accepts. I want him as my number 1 next season"

ah, sorry. agreed, its not like any other business. But this is a "shop", surely this would be as close to a "normal business" as football can get ?

what i dont get is Pressley saying "we are talking to him, but need to wait" Surely if they said to Murphy "we want to 100% keep you, but we signed you in championship and we dont have that money any more. You are my number 1 keeper, are i want you with me, but the max we can give you is "x"."...

its getting as long as the actual stock take !

1 if your settings are on more posts per page

about not having anything to do with JR or Murphy signing a contract ?

sadly, you may well be right. Still have to pay rent for those two days, and we know what CCFC are like when it comes to renting a place that they arent using !

ah, thats ok then.

I wasnt aware every thread needed to be about the JR or Murphys contract ?

i didn't say it would. I would however suggest its yet another sign of how poorly our club is run by the owners. Many other businesses wouldnt accept closing for 2 trading days for a stock take.

where does it say Sixfields ?

good point. Who cares about how the club runs its business in a time when every penny counts !

Where are all the corporate today :whistle:

Fleetwood through !

agreed. but its hardly Tescos. I would suggest that one person would take one day at the most, even if the shop was closed. There is only 300 SKU's at the most !

As the majority of us dont understand what SISU have to gain by winning, we have to assume they will get more out of this than trying to distress ACL ? (who knows what it is though) Grendal made a good point (i know !) earlier saying perhaps this is to draw out some info for another court battle...

I think its more pivital if SISU dont win, then what ?