Search results

If its just down to UK populist press I assume the rest of the EU are saying it?

Probably should have signed him

Rubber bands in batter

I’ll give my head a wobble

Respecting Ruperts opinion as a poster

Pathetic

We did have a lot of chances - their keeper made some quality saves

Gone silent again Danny?

I don’t think anyone has said that but hey ho

Da silva was reportedly offered £8k a week at Bristol - he’s just another example of someone signed as he was a child prodigy at Chelsea - pointless

Hamer scored 5 goals very quickly on arrival The squad has been strengthened all over in theory with significant expenditure and the wage bill will be far higher. Wright is paid more than Gyokeres as will Simms. We’ve spent more on a centre half than I can ever remember. The defence is an...

As I said by your logic when we signed Hamer as his fee was less than Bayliss it’s squad depreciation

Weetabix legs 🤣

By his logic the squad was made worse when we signed Hamer as Tom Bayliss was sold for more money

No it isn’t as the money used strengthens the whole team. So when we signed Gyokeres you are saying he’s not as good as any outgoing player who would have been sold for more than a million?

one of the promoted teams seem to be coping very well in the most competitive leagues in the world

It isn’t accurate as the money is used across the whole squad so the squad is improved By your logic Brentford when they sold Watkins and purchased Ivan Toney had a weaker squad in fact their net spent that season was not £15m like us but £54 million They got promoted

I think you will find my views on him are pretty tame compared to most on here. Take it up with the other dissenters Yes the manager agrees. He also seems to think his £4 million centre half isn’t good enough either and his £7 million striker isnt as good as a 32 year old

lol