Search results

This new variant has been around since September why not just lock done the effected areas?

lots of people won't listen to any changes now so what does the government do? it's 6 days before xmas so loads of people while already be travelling or will have made plans to travel.

Mixed messaging on Xmas bubbles though. some saying it's going to be only 2 households and some saying it will be only allowed on xmas day. Not sure how you can bring in the only xmas rue this close to the day.

Cockneys in tier 4, fuck you Millwall

The wet one then

once bill has had his way with you you are fine to go

Well do you want the top or bottom bunk in your cell?

phone providers can stop that. Anyway which is more expensive buying everyone a cheap house phone from Argos or the money wasted on an app that didn't really work? *no i'm not in the pay of Big Argos

No you'll be out the house, just in a camp. Bramcote will do

Get on argos or get to the camp. Simple, everyone has the ability to have one.

Something simple like only accepting landlines would make sure you are at home.

It's almost like the government should of put a proper system of both support and enforcement in for those who have to isolate

And this is the issue, constantly changing the parameters will make more people ignore the rules.

Yes it is wise to be realistic about what is obtainable.

Because they fucked up by treating London as one mass entity which allowed boroughs in the east with dangerously high case rates to be on the same level as other more western boroughs with much lower case rates. This is another lack consistency as well as the have told Greater Manchester you...

To some people yes but as I said 2 weeks ago 150 to 160 was seen as the bench mark so it's the lack of consistency that is the issue. You set a target, people reach that target and the you ignore said target. When you keep a sector of the economy closed that isn't the vector of transmission...

Not true figures of 150 to 160 per 100k were treated as great work just 2 weeks ago.

The national average has gone up because of places in the south east that are running at 500 per 100k. When a city has figures that are less than that which led they government to praise Liverpool just 2 weeks ago you can see why the decision is questioned.

maybe he should of done a better job when picked almost half of them

The local decision in Coventry according to DHSC is based on a perceived increase in cases which is at best very small. The cases in coventry according to them are below the national average and hospital and icu usage is also below the national average.