Search results

At least top half finish for me, if only to arrest the slump somewhat.

My main tactical suggestion would be to employ Ruben Lameiras in a roaming role, going up to each Bradford player and repeating everything they say in a high whiny voice. Once one eventually snaps and twats him, we're quids in. Unless it's the same ref that let Jay McEveley try to remove his...

Both have been, although you have to go back a century in Arsenal's case.

We'll be good at Mo with a little bit of practice though.

Yesterday's win ought to be dedicated to the subtle old Millwall fan in block 17 who lost himself and stood up to punch the air when they scored, and never got off his seat for the rest of the game.

I'm more than happy with the idea of looking down the ladder for potential. As much as I've lolled at Chris Stokes' non-league first touch at times he's been a bit of a revelation, more of that kind of thing would do me.

If he's being told that he's got a chance of the first team football he craves next season and still decides to go elsewhere, leave him there.

The idea of 19000 people turning up for Cov vs Plymouth, blimey.

I have to say I do miss when an international tournament would lead to the discovery of great players you'd never seen before. It's nice that you have the entire world of football available to read about and watch at your fingertips, but a lot of the mystery has gone.

I used Ivanov on there, RIP to the inspiration behind the name. There was a guy with a constant array of aliases, I only remember 'seeyagunnarsson' or similar being one. Was that him?

I don't think I've expected less from a game this season than I do for Saturday.

There shouldn't really be any reason for trouble - Millwall fans will be placated by their side's handsome win while Cov fans will be too depressed to get angry.

Have to buy those nuclear warheads somehow.

Athletic Bilbao will be the only team left, and even they've snuck a few Frenchmen in over the years.

The pain you feel is because you're trying to get people to agree with something that has no logical basis. If you remove something from the past, it doesn't mean everything else around it would have stayed the same, it's the complete unknown.

It is a bit ridiculous for all the reasons stated. Without Adam Armstrong we wouldn't see players passing to an empty space where Adam Armstrong ought to be.

Not really, because Armstrong's place would be taken by someone else who could have been as good, better or worse. It's impossible to say.

If we hadn't signed Armstrong we'd just put 10 men out every week, it makes perfect sense.

I bet it's nearly all the same people there now too.

I worked in the Walsgrave Tesco years ago and had the luxury* of responsibility for reducing the fresh food and it was a bit like that. I worked three evenings and I'd see the exact same half-dozen people casually wandering round with a basket waiting for the man with the gun to pop up, I assume...