If there's anything in Bellfields claim, and I appreciate its a big if, then you're supporting a wrongful conviction that potentially left Bellfield free to kill so you're not quite on the moral high ground you think you are.
I'm not comfortable with fitting people up for crimes they didn't commit.
If he's as bad as you say I would imagine convicting him for something he has done wouldn't be too difficult.
The answer isn't to convict him for something he didn't do, that's a very dangerous path that certain.police forces have already been down and it didn't end well.
But he should be locked up for something he did, not something he didn't do.
Locking people up for things they didn't do has cost the taxpayer a lot of money over the years, sound convictions based on good evidence is how it should work.
If he didn't commit the crime he shouldn't be in jail for it, simple as that.
If he's comitted a murder that he hasn't been prosecuted for the police should work on gathering evidence and securing a conviction.
Unfortunately there are people who do exactly that but don't acknowledge his attributes.
I've not seen anyone try and defend his finishing just point out that despite how poor he is in front of goal he brings a lot to the team.
That doesn't make sense, you imprison the wrong person, the case is closed, and there is still a killer walking the street but an in ocent person is in jail.