Search results

what about his bucket?

which is why stats have their place but they only tell part of the story.

they're on the bench because there's no-one else. It's that simple. It's not having a pop at them, it's having a pop at the fact Robins wasn't backed in January and is operating with his hands tied behind his back.

It's ridiculous the two of them along with Reid are even on the bench, absolutely no depth to the squad.

Yeah, my reply was also a joke,well, supposed to be!

Though a massive chance of it happening compared to bringing in Billy Gilmour which has also been suggested

I had to Google this because I thought you might be on the wind up but no, its true! Interesting company, bookmarked their Web page, think I'll put an order in if I can't find any locally.

This is why I think we signed Bidwell, he wanted a non loanee left back/left wing back with a bit of experience. Not really worked out so far.

One made a dodgy substitution, one brought the world to the brink of war, Robins clearly has the more severe case!

Eh? On here or on Twitter? Edit - the penny's just dropped!

Half man half biscuits new album, the Voltarol years. Excellent. Fairly sure there's a reference to a cheese and onion batch in the lyrics as well!

I'm fine with it. You were the one bemoaning whataboutery, I'm pointing out that you're now indulging in it.

These comparisons with Macron sound like whataboutery to me! And just a reminder, he's not our PM.

Yes, I agree, but it's highly relevant to our response. And what lead us here is irrelevant now, it's how we resolve it that's important.

Haha!! We've got them on the run!!

Given the current situation its highly relevant. Thats why one of Johnson own MPs is banging on about it in Parliament.

I know you jest but looking through the replies it seems it is considered genuine but it's twitter so who knows for sure?

I've no time for Macron, but to try and use him to paint Johnson as competent, and more importantly, not corrupt, is insane.

Not at all. You think the tory parties closeness tothepeiple they're supposed to be sanctioning isn't relevant? That's a weird take. And of course if this was a Labour government you wouldn't mention it.

Talk ofgoing down the WMD route, I'm sure Blair can offer them some advise for a fee