Search results

Not sure. Hence the question. There's also this St Helens https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/00331905 Same address and some of the same personel listed. Maybe its a propco opco arrangement. Not really sure. The address is the address of the stadium from what I can tell.

Look at the list of companies Dermot Coleman is listed as a director of on the link.

Positives positives positives? We're 8 points of a playoff place.

Mention the legacy again in this article http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/anger-coventry-city-fail-acknowledge-11922072

Mentioned in this article to http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-road-re-named-jimmy-11913722

Nick spin http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/legend-jimmy-hill-live-thanks-11281363

I guess you can't believe headlines. Take the thread title for instance "Telegraph Spin" apparently not about the telegraph spinning stories given that there is no conspiracy. Maybe all these articles are being picked over by yourself to prove that there is no spin and therefore no conspiracy...

Positives positives positives? MK and Oldham are currently drawing and Swindon are losing so we shouldn't drop back into the relegation places.

The sport that is, not the town https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/JxaRGRMymrRHScYP_fyEORJtThQ/appointments

Trump has settled his fraud cases out of court now instead of going to trial next month. A complete U turn apparently http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38021820

They've also done an article recently promoting Xmas gifts from the club shop (the CT that is, not the observer) strange Nick and Dave haven't fallen over themselves to talk about that article. I think Nick brushed it of as a slow news day article when I pointed it out to him. Anything to damage...

Well, at least you acknowledge Nick and Dave have spun this one which is more than they were willing to admit.

Like I said. Selective or short memory. The last time JS used the SCG to attack the Trust for attacking the owners wasn't the first time was it? How long ago was the first time? So was the letter that the trust received from the owners lawyers threatening them to take a link down or face the...

Must have learned that from Nick and Dave.

You either have a short or selective memory. So when the trust got a threatening letter from the owners solicitors over an article they linked on their official website they weren't complaining about the owners? Was the article positive and the owners didn't appreciate the positive publicity...

They have and I've given countless examples of how they have.

The post he was replying to said "The club's a mess and going nowhere, oh well let's give a load of stick to people who complain about it, like the CT and the Trust, as if it is their fucking fault...." He talked about the mess of the club in general and then pointed out that people are...

Of course it wasn't your point. You never make one.

Apologies. Point stands though. He stated that no one was complaining before. They clearly were. The CT petition isn't the first petition centred around SISU's ownership and their ability to run the club. The march recently organised is also the third march that I know of again centred around...

Awww bless. You think Grendull was making a point. Don't you worry your cotton little socks about it.