Search results

Not being word for word would be normal and acceptable. The suggestion seems to be whole subjects are omitted from the minutes because the owners don't approve and the people / person who raised said subject seem to be getting harassed personally after the event. That's an issue.

Indeed. The trust could have raised the issue of the minutes being selective and that to could have been omitted from the minutes. In fact given what Ray has said if they have raised the point it almost certainly would have been omitted.

Is there any scenario where the trust can win with some? Speak out and get lambasted as being confrontational on here, don't speak out and get lambasted on here for not being confrontational.

The trust can't say shit without getting lambasted on the SCG or on here. How would this end up any different. Too many fans don't have their eyes on the prize especially on here. They'd rather nit pick the trust, the CT or whoever than address what's going very very wrong within the club. Rays...

Basically said that the SCG (of which he was a member, if I heard right representing the diamond club) was basically a place of intimidation where questioning our owners isn't allowed meaning that the only people who do is the trust representation and when he's done it in the past by the time he...

Apparently you have to go to at least 75% (I think that's right isn't it Grendull?) of games before you have the right to a valid opinion. Which is of course elitist tosh.

No more than Punch and Judy from GMK and you still haven't answered the question. Does it make FP wrong because Bob agrees with him and he wasn't at the game?

Quite eye opening wasn't it. He was saying that he is expecting to get bombarded with a load of emails now for speaking out publicly about it because he gets them after an SCG meeting if he dares criticises the owners during it. Also said that the minutes are highly edited to say what the owners...

To be honest I don't see long term how it's going to make any difference who the manager is. I was lambasted last time we were looking for saying exactly that. Mowbray came in, did enough to keep us up, signed full time, got flaunted by some as a premier league quality manager, something I got...

Does that mean he's not allowed to agree with FP? The fact that he does makes FP wrong? Or was there another point to your cuntish, pointless reply to his post? You accusing others of being a wum, ha ha ha. Priceless.

Doing DIY as it goes. That must make FP double wrong given that both me and Bob weren't there but yet we both agree with him.

If he wasn't at the game does that make FP wrong?

The club is a well practiced chameleon already. I'd be sad to lose sky-blue but then RB light has a sky-blue can so that wouldn't necessarily have to happen. RB Coventry? Wouldn't have an issue with that, it's not like the club hasn't changed it's name before. But key would have to be selling a...

You don't think that there is the slightest chance then that these people who are "dangerous" for our future actually hate SISU because of what SISU have done to the club? Because you seem to be suggesting that they're oblivious to what SISU have done to the club and their loathing for them is...

I think he's helping Paul Appleton in that photo looking for the for the golden share :)

Sorry Mr. Super Fan. I'm not worthy.

As apposed to making scapegoats out of CT & CCC while ignoring what our owners do.

Probably because it's so out weighed by your posts and threads on the CT and CCC. I must admit I don't remember you saying anything like that and I admittedly spend far to much time on here. SISU comments from you are background noise (more like whisper) compared to the rest of your traffic so...

Well done. I'm not worthy Mr super fan. Clearly that makes it right to show more concern about telegraph spin that effects the club very little if at all than the SISU spin that effects the club on every level. You certainly don't argue it. Hard to argue it when you bury your head in the sand...

Nick and the telegraph spin is a joke especially when we have the "invested £60M" spin from our owners, the "we've moved on" spun, the "we're talking to local authorities, environment agencies blah blah blah" spin. The list goes on and on. Yet Nick isn't worried about the spin from our owners...