Search results

They can players back, it won't be played until next month now they have not got up to 20 players out

It's a good excuse for them though now to get a tricky away game called off.

To be fair that is the same story as we already now. It will be off though as it seems if you ask they will say yes

Seems that is the rules but are they being followed?

Nick states 27 players plus 7 U23s with squad numbers

Only need 14 of them to be fit to playthe game as per the rules. I hope city are pointing this out

The 1960s haven't reached them yet mate

wow that Tory MP thought he had a zinger there

Derby argued they have no medical team left

this is the point I am making, the rules are clear but the EFL isn't sticking to them

What were the covid agreements the clubs all signed up to? It's not the breaking off Government laws but EFL rules I'd look at

Am I missing something, that is a link to the enhanced covid protcols clubs now have to follow?

If true it would be laughable for the Football League to call it off without punishing Stoke, In Scotland when one Celtic player broke the rules by travelling to Spain the government got involved

United - Brighton off in PL as well

If true game needs to be on or forfeited by them

It will probably be called off but the league has rules and it really should stick to them

1) How can they say where they caught it? If they can they need to get in touch with Health Security England to tell them how ;) 2) As I said the EPL has said no to Leicester when they presented 9 cases.

The UEFA and EPL guidelines are if there are 14 fit senior players then the game should go ahead. While it's now been called off due to even more cases the EPL said no to calling off the Leicester vs. Spurs game when Leicester had 9 players out.

Why would the accept it if the rules they have state the game should be played?

Do they have 14 fit players? If so should be game on