Search results

That's still a no. All you've talked about is opinion and hearsay. I asked you if you've got the figures and you clearly don't. I've had a look at their latest filed accounts and under turnover there are 2 figures in the breakdown. 1 under match receipts and the other under football and...

So you don't have the figures then. Here's a link to the Cinnamon trust page that has the donations link on. Thanks very much, you're £10 will go to a very worthy cause. The Cinnamon Trust - The National Charity for the elderly, the terminally ill and their pets - Contact Details

It would be vastly different. I just don't know what we would gain had we franchised out the stadium to AEG. Didn't some say the link between AEG and SISU was Leonard Brody? I'm sure i remember someone on here making the connection when TF started going on about bringing in AEG all the years ago.

But at the preferred option of the BPA we'd still be paying rent, we would be capping our attendances at a much lower (maybe nearly a third) level than what we could get now, what extra income streams would we actually be getting (why are CRFC likely to share any of the other 24/7/365 income...

It's hard to see how it would. Especially when you're capping your ticket revenue. It all depends on what long term deal we can negotiate at the Ricoh I guess but based on the current deal I cant see how it does. Especially when you start to factor in the cost of developing and associated...

Fisher wanted to outsource the whole lot didn't he if SISU took control of the Ricoh. To AEG if I remember correctly. What would that have left for the club? Also why AEG? Is there a conection there with SISU?

You could argue that essentially the match day catering has been franchised out like the shop, tickets and programs.

You're still not looking at £360K to £75K, you're looking at £ 90K - £126K (based on 25-35% profit) against £75K but you also have to factor in costs and ricks of the whole sit. If we owned the Ricoh and took the whole profit of £150K it wouldn't be a case of thank you very much let's throw it...

They generate £369,501.00 off turnover we take £75K of profit. Which is why I was asking OSB if the costs were listed. OSB does mention that TF has eluded to the surplus being 30% so on that basis (if true) that would be £110K as apposed to £75K not £369K but with non of the associated costs and...

And the link will show figures (which was my original point) that prove your claim that it "easily exceeds" the rent? I mean you've already back tracked to 95% but whatever. And if the link doesn't prove your claim that it "easily exceeds" you have to give £10 to my preferred animal charity of...

That's still a no then.

That's a no then.

Do both disclose a cost breakdown as well OSB? Or any other clubs for that matter? What is the running cost of say a 12K stadium? Once that is taken into account what does that actually leave from the 24/7/365 revenue by way of profit that contributes to spend on the pitch?

It's very easy to assume that they don't want to disclose the full picture because the real story doesn't tow the line with the mantra repeatedly spouted by Fisher.

It was a tongue in cheek quip. Get over it.

What is?

Problem for most people is that it does't. Never more true than this season.

Corrected for you ;)

You have the figures then?

I am a child. I admit it. Probably why I don't put myself forward to judge others on childish behavior. Well others except Grendull ;)