Search results

that's the impression I got because there was no clear statement from the club. It's clear to me they could have called off all 3 games the 2nd weekend of the season. They'v e handled it poorly.

I'm not making myself clear, we've had 3 games called off, if the pitch is that bad then they must have known at least a couple of weeks ago. The late Rotherham announcement would have been fine if it was a close run thing and Wigan was on, but the pitch must have been in a terrible state and...

yeah, after the inspection Saturday evening, which gave the impression it was borderline, yet we've had another 2 postponements, no way it was borderline, the club must have known the severity of the situation yet we've been strung along in a similar fashion for Wigan and now Huddersfield.

the game was officially called off Saturday evening, less than 24 hours before kick off, piss poor. And like I said in another post, if it was borderline fair enough, but if it was, we wouldn't have then had a further 2 games postponed.

it's true. Just look at the threads on here relating to the issue, no one really knew what was going on and now we're on to our third postponement. We were kept in the dark like fucking idiots, piss poor from the club.

it's quite clear to me that the Rotherham game was never going to be on. If it was anywhere close to being a borderline decision then even if Rotherham hadn't gone ahead then surely Wigan would of? They knew more than they were letting on and they kept the support in the dark.

probably not, but he could have treated supporters with a bit more respect. He gets credit for the overall improvement in communication since hes arrived so he has to take criticism in an instance like this when it's been poor.

kept supporters in the dark through all of it but happily took ST money.

think something has already been mentioned on here recently. They are absolute scumbags.

the one potential silver lining of this shit show.

to be fair, if he can drum up support and get a few people up there then fair enough. No point in having several different protests planned.

not all the blame, far from it, I agree, but he should of been more aware of what was going on, or not going on as the case may be, and kept the support better informed.

Last time PSB was involved in a protest he ended up having coffee and biscuits with Nick Eastwood. Probably threw in a couple of free tickets.

We have 13k season ticket holders, (many aren't based in the city), we were told on the eve of the Rotherham game it wouldn't go ahead. Was that because Boddy didn't know how bad the situation was? Or did he know but adopted a hope for the best approach? Either way, that's on him, he was either...

I'm not solely blaming Boddy. But he has to share some responsibility. The lack of communication to supporters falls at his door for starters. And I'm prepared to come together with anyone to protest against wasps, hopefully at their 2nd home game of the season.

Was it West Ham who played a player who it transpired was unregistered due to an admin error and fired the club seceratary? This is far worse. I'm not advocating for him to be sacked but he needs to start prioritising our support over the sensibilities of those wasps wankers.

I've no axe to grind with Boddy, but on this issue he can't be defended Pete. A protest has been mentioned, (I hope it goes ahead), and I bet my house Boddy will be all over it trying to stop it like last time. He should have been as proactive on this issue.

Well that makes it even worse that he took what he was telling him at face value. 13k ST holders, probably 4 or 5k walk up and 1500 away fans only found out Rotherham was off on Saturday evening, he can't get a pass on that. It's absolutely amateur.

There's the problem, he's too cosy with Vaughan. He should have been overseeing this every step of the way, not taking everything his pal said at face value.

He really dropped the ball on this one Pete. First home Saturday game not played until September - unforgivable.