Search results

What on earth is the wrong path? Being gay in a religious black community? He wasn’t a child abuser.

His game against Blackburn was his 100th league appearance for us

Every management role I’ve done was without overtime

You once started a thread moaning you were in the higher tax bracket and were their any tips on how to avoid paying it

£10 grand support on a Jaguar I Pace and they still are not selling

Yes and manufacturers are offering huge discounted support to retailers to try and get rid of them

This will prove interesting if the Jollyy Green Twat has his way https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/10/04/diesel-car-sales-outpace-evs-industry-criticises-net-zero/#:~:text=By%20comparison%2C%20private%20sales%20of,watering%20%C2%A35%2C500%20per%20car.

A lot of people who have cancer do still work

I was glad they won. Never had a problem with them

You have quoted a bat shit conspiracy theorist who harassed victims of the Manchester bombing as supporting evidence

The Witchcraft nonsense was enough for me https://barthsnotes.com/2019/01/02/police-whistleblowers-group-raises-concerns-about-jon-wedger-and-maggie-oliver/

You have actually quoted Richard Hall as a serious reporter. I assume this is the same Richard Hall who said the Manchester bombings were staged by the British government and no-one died? The victimes were sent abroad and the coffins were empty boxes and the grieving fake? Oddly I have not...

Oh Jesus the flat earth society have entered the building

they weren’t prosecuted as their was zero evidence they did anything. What a dumb comeback. What was Harold Shipman’s motive? Fair bit of evidence in that trial was based on statistics. The conviction is considered unsafe? By who?

He didn’t distribute the ball - he hoofed it up the pitch

The evidence that convicted her will still be presented - the evidence has been reviewed. She was found guilty again in a separate trial. Have you read any of the submitted evidence in the case?

Challenged by who? What about Baby C whose mother was dismissed by Letby and told to leave the unit as she was a nurse and needed to help the baby who subsequently dies. Letby does not recall the conversation. Letby when going home then spent hours trawling the parents on facebook

it’s circumstantial evidence which is an entirely legitimate form of evidence. It’s also pretty much non refutable. It was bought up in the subsequent court case wasn’t it? The gap is statistically huge.

If course it’s evidence

How about the consultant paediatrician who saw Letby standing over a baby watching blood levels dropping and not raising any alarms - the doctor resuscitated the baby Letby says in her defence she can’t remember it happening