Search results

Well if everyone who voted reform in the last GE return and also the 4 million who didn’t vote now do?

Make is a wild card but I think will do pretty well

The racist old duffers in the Tory membership have elected the first black person to lead a uk political party

Badenoch for me Charles. Who did you vote for?

I haven’t said it was but anyway according to you he is discredited as he dares to put articles in the Spectator and The Times (heaven forbid) - you do understand what he’s saying don’t you? It’s not the article by the way - have another go

It’s also hardly massive as Bill Clinton was in the crew as well

The quote is from a guardian article two days ago

Im not sure what I’m doing to myself. Perhaps you can elaborate for the forum from Croatia/Ireland/Hinkley or Coventry or any other place your fantasy mind believes as an “FD” you now reside in

Let’s be very blunt here. Someone who pretended he lived in Croatia to adopt an alternative character to appear a bit more interesting than the dull creature known as Ring of Steel - or indeed the pathetic Cov identity - really has nothing worthy of my engagement

I have given a summation by a QC who I believe trumps a “specialist journalist” (what does that even mean?) You seem like an emotional petulant child now out of his/her depth. I suggest you go to bed now and leave adults to debate this. You had a go to be fair and fell on your arse.

A detailed analysis? Oh dear.

Oh dear - someone is angry. I was asking if the comments made by the aforementioned people regarding the Kaba incident are breaches under the same legislation that the police are hiding behind now. If you can’t debate don’t engage

It’s hardly lots of words. It’s really an interpretation of the contempt of court act where statements made in the public could influence a trial. It’s worth noting that Jonathan Hall QC - who is the independent reviewer of terrorism laws apparently - has said that information can be revealed...

I don’t see where I am wrong at all - you as usual are just flapping around trying to defend the indefensible

I’ve made my point in one of the posts above. What is your point and why are you so invested?

They said there was low risk in Southport - which suggests there was some

They cordoned off areas of Salisbury didn’t they?

So if the poison was deemed life threatening they still couldn’t say anything?

THE TONESTER RETURNS

Oh dear. The mask is slipping.