Search results

Undoubtedly most are from the commonwealth I wouldn’t disagree with that, but it still amounts to the same problem. Lack of investment, especially in training meaning that a shortfall has to be made up from somewhere else. Immigrants.

So basically you didn’t know what you voted for. You were voting blind.

You have to factor in how many EU nationals work in the NHS. You also have to factor in why. Why is because of a lack of investment in the NHS meaning we don’t train enough nurses, doctors and midwives so the quotas are filled by immigrant nurses, doctors and midwives. The failing of the NHS is...

Just not one that represents your interests apparently. Why did you vote out again? I can’t ever imagine personally deliberately voting for something that doesn’t represent my interests but that’s what you seem to be admitting to.

Do you believe that what you voted for is what is being delivered? I’m not talking about the execution I’m talking about the terms.

We’re finding out aren’t we. It’s one of those phrases that got coined and thrown around and applauded largely by the brexit camp and now the ripples of doubt are starting to come from those very same Applaudees. I got it from a few angles on here for suggesting that nobody really knew what...

I get all that but the moment that it was declared out means out, we’re having a hard brexit (something wholly applauded by the out camp) how was brexit ever going to be different to what’s happening? Other than being better organised. Surely if out means out then this is out. The details...

We’re having a hard brexit but we want to pick and choose some aspects of being an EU member. Isn’t that a contradiction?

Out of interest how do you think the situation would have differed under a competent government rather than the joke conservative one? Serious question. Personally I doubt if any of the details of the deal as it’s unfolding would have been majorly different from what they are. The only thing I...

TBF the account he mistakenly tagged it to only had six followers. You can see how he made the mistake;)

If Trump was shown the film The Dictator how long would it take for him to tweet concern about the rogue state of the Republic of Wadiya and it’s nuclear options? The supreme leader is correct. It needs to be pointy.

Brexit: Nigel Farage only turned up to one of 42 EU fisheries committee meetings | Descrier News Even when it’s apparently important to him.

Still. On a positive note a solution has been found to find the answers to the problems of the Irish border Irish History To Be Written On Side Of A Bus For British People

Don’t worry about the pensions. Ferage and co want nothing to do with the EU so he won’t be taking his €6k a month pension from them. Right? UKIP’s dilemma: Pension or principles? Mind you, he has worked for it. Right? Donate Nigel Farage's EU pension to charity | Campaigns by You And it’s...

I see he’s been at it again. Retweeting Britain First unsubstantiated right wing tweets.

That’s the thing isn’t it. You and me and a couple of others get accused of hating the country but we ain’t the ones who continually put it down. I love the modern UK with it’s diversity, I can accept that our customs and traditions have been shaped by foreign influence whether that be invading...

He’s a politician. I wouldn’t trust him any more than I would someone who insists that there isn’t a magic money tree and then promptly found one because an ill advised decision lost them their overall majority and they had to buy the influence of a minority party. But at least labour put...

You should probably read what you link in full before you link it.

I've read the article now and it says word for word "The tougher stance amounts to a gross settlement of €91bn-€113bn, which over many years would net at about €55bn-€75bn." and you ask me if I can read. In today's money that equates to £48.58b - £ 66.24b GBP. So the leaked agreed settlement if...