Search results

Lol

We’ll have no trouble here

Would you have rather Starmer was spending £3 billion a year on Ukraine rather than here to ensure more lives were lost?

I know the EU can make entry rules up as they go along but allowing Ukraine entry would mean they have torn up all rules of entry Frankly it’s all entirely tenable as Ukraine are not in a position to dictate anything

Denying entry to NATO is a must

So they’d let the children and wife stay when their lives are under threat?

This of course is the problem with having Biden sleeping in the White House for a few more weeks until Trump can actually stop this nonsense

The Ukrainian stance was until now there would be no talks until Russia exited Ukraine - including rather laughably Crimea. His game is now over

Shugs responding to concerns about a new stadium in Kent “Build and they will come”

Not again. So does every owner issue loans

Indeed

I have two apprentices who now earn well above average wage and one who has studied while at work. For many people they can easily be a better route to skills and full time employment

Not really. The trail with King is a lot easier and he is I believe the sole shareholder. Most clubs have loans out in by individuals or syndicates of investors

He won’t be putting in himself. He will have backers presumably via his hedge fund

He wants to clearly create a set up which is easily going to fit to the top flight. Hes not going to be inhibited by making a expensive appointment

Unlikeky I would think unless the club sells

The last accounts show he put £6 million into the club

Shultz has reopened dialogue with Putin

He clearly does as it loses operationally £7 million per annum

If I was King I’d be moving heaven and earth to get him