Search results

  1. skybluetony176

    Poll

    That’s pretty much what we did last season. Clearly works;)
  2. skybluetony176

    Slade

    His first 6 games were promotion form, won 3 drew 2 lost 1. In fact that form would have seen us promoted as champions of form over a whole season. Aside from that he was shit, granted, but it’s wrong to say we didn’t experience new manager bounce under him. Results clearly say otherwise for his...
  3. skybluetony176

    A realist in this time of gloom

    So he’s injured then not shit. Which is the point that the OP was making.
  4. skybluetony176

    Poll

    So basically our best manager for 27+ years needs sacking because he isn’t good enough, according to some. Maybe the problem is elsewhere and he happens to have just overcome that problem better than those before him. Even the managers who got backing from the owners during operation premiership...
  5. skybluetony176

    Poll

    I wanted to know what it feels like to be as dumb as you.
  6. skybluetony176

    Slade

    Apparently, technically he wasn’t sacked. He was on a rolling 6 month contract and they’ve chosen not to roll it forward another 6 months.
  7. skybluetony176

    Poll

    Sack him. Slade is available again. Not sure who we’re going to replace him with. We could gamble on a complete rookie, maybe promote from within or go for another journey man who will probably be no better qualified, get some new manager bounce at the start of next season, the usual suspects on...
  8. skybluetony176

    Meltdown

    Barely been on. You’re safe :)
  9. skybluetony176

    15 games to save his job.

    We had four managers last season so clearly that theory doesn’t work. In fact if anything it proves the opposite of what you’re claiming. Chopping and changing managers doesn’t work.
  10. skybluetony176

    15 games to save his job.

    Not being funny but if mediocrity isn’t your thing you really are supporting the wrong club.
  11. skybluetony176

    New Ricoh deal close / One Year Agreed

    Because a JR is about decision made during a passage of time. During that passage of time they were the owners and their argument will be that they were damaged as owners during that passage of time. Selling the club might actually increase they’re chances of getting compensation. They’re never...
  12. skybluetony176

    New Ricoh deal close / One Year Agreed

    Didn’t see that. Only have my reading glasses on not glasses for distance.
  13. skybluetony176

    New Ricoh deal close / One Year Agreed

    That’s just gone to warp speed. Hardly failing :)
  14. skybluetony176

    New Ricoh deal close / One Year Agreed

    It’s a good idea but unfortunately sisu aren’t going anywhere;)
  15. skybluetony176

    The EU: In, out, shake it all about....

    He did seem very noncommittal at times to exactly what his group stands for. Glad someone else noticed it, I thought it was just me.
  16. skybluetony176

    The EU: In, out, shake it all about....

    That happens a lot to gain EU certificates of origin or claim a country or origin. Nothing illegal about it so long as you pay all duties and tax of course. You just have to do a finishing process on a product. I had a cousin in Northern Ireland who used to work in a Waterford Crystal factory...
  17. skybluetony176

    The EU: In, out, shake it all about....

    Interesting that you said there was one in Hamburg. 10 seconds on google and I pull this up https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/customs- procedures/what-is-importation/free-zones_en Sounding like another blue passport gimmick. Could do it anyway. If you look at the list the U.K...
  18. skybluetony176

    The EU: In, out, shake it all about....

    Watching question time last night and the guy from the out means out group (or whatever they call themselves) was banging on about the creation of free ports post brexit and how this would create thousands of jobs. Obviously he’s never heard of something called IP Inward Processing - GOV.UK the...
Top