Search results

Why pay for fuel and to maintain the planes when you can"divert" that money into super yachts

We should be winning this as even though they are more organised under McCatrthy they are still pretty shit. 2 or 3 - 1 to us and some c**t will fall in teh sea

Gus isn't a 10, that midfield could work in a 6 and 2 8's system though

So the piloting is the Russian Airforce is pretty shit as well

state of the desperation on show here

The budget seems that bad that the usual suspects aren't spamming my socials telling me how great it is

yet nothing that really helps ordinary people it's like they have given up on being elected

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/conservative-councillor-calls-arsenal-legend-ian-wright-a-typical-black-hypocrite/ar-AA18C81j?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=8c9af56d3ac94dffaeaa561dbf3bc923&ei=25 Tories gonna tory

it's not bye bye your virginity though

their problem is the culture war nonsense isn't moving the dial for them

it's quite meta to see them doorstepping themselves

But naming the defendants doesn't help you get a conviction, in fact it is fuel for a mistrial appeal.

look mate guns don't kill people toddlers with access to guns kill people ;)

Why? Contempt of court is a crime now and you can see yourself in real trouble for talking about a case if it is deemed to have endangered the trial. The law's are already there

Yep, definitely looks like this. At least the once in the case of the guy they proved was nowhere near the area when she claimed it happened. Is Anonymity for defendants and proper punishment for those who break this online?

Yeah, it's that despite all evidence showing she lied and made everything up she still carries on the act that it all really happened. Is it a ruse to show she is mentally ill (or more so) or is she really that ill? I hope she gets hope and finds the peace she needs in life.

i notice her made it all about "muslim grooming gangs" when a number of the men she accused were white Fat googley eyed Luton c**t

She did say those words They were not legally needed so there was not need to say them.

Also the "One off" part was wrong as it only gives his side. His wife claimed it happened many times.

it was basically a defence rather than a legal clarification