Search results

You said we need Tommy Robinson in your first post on this thread. Have you changed your mind all of a sudden?

You do realise that you constantly repeat his rhetoric? Maybe you don’t take yourself seriously either in that case. In that case there’s no point anyone taking you seriously.

So you are taking him seriously then.

H & J for me. Like the collors

If you’re not taking him seriously why did you say in your opening post that we need TR? Why have you constantly attacked people who point out why we shouldn’t take him seriously? What points has he made exactly?

But we should take a narcissist with a fraud conviction a contempt of court conviction who operates under a false name and has a camcorder and a Facebook account seriously?

Parts 1 & 2 of a 3 part trial has finished as chief Dave has already pointed out. What are you seriously suggesting? That the blackout should be lifted and risk part 3? Because that’s what it sounds like. Unless you want to give them a chance of getting away with what they’re accused of in part...

But it has been reported. Countless posters now have posted countless links to it being reported pre media blackout as imposed by the court. When the media blackout has been lifted it will be reported again. What is so difficult about that that some people can’t understand? As I keep pointing...

Everyone has acknowledged the problem. No one has said or hates this group being persecuted so long as that is through the proper channels ie the justice system. Pointing out that TR is only targeting a specific demographic of these gangs is doing neither of the things you’re accusing people of...

Tommy Robinson hasn’t outed anyone and the only person who’s risked them being allowed to walk the streets is Tommy Robinson.

He’s a narcissist as has already been pointed out. That’s why he’s an attention seeking knobhead. Any subject matter he covers is almost irrelevant to him, it’s all about all eyes on me. He just happens to be a racist as well as a narcissist.

1) I never said you worshipped him 2) No one is apologising for grooming gangs. Muslim or otherwise. 3) Tommy Robinson hasn’t made a valid point in his life.

We can discuss it all you like. If you want a proper discussion though try getting your education from anyone other than Tommy Robinson. You might actually get something right then.

You do realise that one individual could be in all three groups don’t you? It’s usually the crimes that are grouped not the individuals. If one individual is guilty of more than one crime they could be in two or maybe three of the trials.

There was always going to be a reason... ...other than Tommy Robinson’s drivel for the gullible.

A quick look on google and it tells you that the media blackout is still in place and ends later this year. The trial itself might have finished but that doesn’t mean a decision has been handed down, sentences have been passed and crucially this trial isn’t linked to others that could be...

Has the trial finished yet?

But he only covers ones that have been covered already, that’s been pointed out numerous times to you now by numerous posters. He waits until they come to trial, at which point it’s already been reported on pre trial (as per the numerous links shown to you), a subsequent reporting blackout is...

Everything Tommy Robinson does is about Tommy Robinson. He’s an attention seeking knobhead who’s only concern is exposure for himself. Why else do you think he’s latched onto such a controversial subject?

He paid didn’t he? Unlike the cinnamon trust (my charity of choice) who wouldn’t have got a penny had I have taken a bet with you on your terms because there was no scenario where I could win. You have some neck accusing others of trying to welch out of paying charities when you load bets one...