The problem is that the personal clash between him and Giblet means that Giblet is constantly trying to prove him wrong, that's despite LR winning an employment tribunal over the CT burying the ACL loan buyout.
Yep, as I said above it's all down to definitions really. How you try and define legal action considering the array of direct and indirect routes is difficult.
Sounds like rather than is. I cannot take seriously somebody advocating removing the club from the League (unless he doesn't understand the ramifications of removing the golden share).