glad you cleared that up .
the way you phrased It left It a tad ambiguous .
Re MUTTON For NW and others ,he was Flooded with E-mails at the time he was making comments in public that were personal and should never have been made as a council leader.
It's generally been a pleasant experience to meet other posters In real life when chatting while travelling to a match.
In fact whatever the viewpoint Pro/Anti etc we all are family ..
It's not like In the past you could'nt express you're opinion at the game to a complete stranger and gain...
Which begs the question ,what relevence can there be to the counter SISU are now involved In,as i would say there Is no counter and they will be made to pay .
He's saying there were no implied terms in the Contract that had the clause ,that should talks break down SISU were liable to £29k.contribution to Higgs costs incurred ,and once the six week period of HOT was over no right to expect exclusivity.
The charity had insisted on a clause which said Sisu would cover their costs for negotiations - up to £29,000 - if talks broke down, when they commenced discussions with Sisu.