Search results

Funny how Man City are now the Sky Blues. When I was a kid they were always known as the Light Blues and City were the only Sky Blues.

Well, those winners tell me the bigger sides probably don't take it that seriously and most likely field weakened sides.

Indeed. Probably only cost us a pound.

Why do people seem to think we do well in any competition? History tells us we won't. History also tells us we consistently lose to lower league teams. Also, history tells us that it is more often than not, not one of the fancied sides that wins it. 04–05: Wrexham 2005–06: Swansea Cit 2006–07...

:thinking about: 2-1 City.

This is too good to be true. Must be a wind-up!!

Think if City win tonight they will win the title.

Surely it's worth our offering Bell to a club for nothing and our giving them 100,000 grand as a sweetner. Stop them being too angry with us then later on when they find out what a bag of wank he is.

I would say he won't come back cos AT didn't seem too enamoured with him when he said he wanted first team football. Get the feeling he burned all his bridges.

What about that young lad from the academy. He bangs goals in for fun. Jonson Clarke-Harris I think his name is. :whistle:

So what is it now I wonder. Anyone know? :thinking about:

;););):thinking about:;)

Twas a joke about getting sidetracked, but never mind. :whistle:

Although 1 goal in 4 is better than any of our lot, you do have to think we need someone with a better goal per game ratio.

Sorry ....what were you saying again? :thinking about:

Is it right to assume then that the 22,000 break even figure was only based on Premiership wages? If so, I didn't know that was the case.

Well that was going to be another point. Sponsorship and advertising is going to be less for sure. Be interesting to know what the break even would be for League One wages. This could be a saving grace for us if we can keep wages down and do well. Do well and attendances will obviously increase.

Think people only talked about Arry though cos that's all the press were talking about and everyone just assumed that it would be him.

Maybe Hodgson is just in place for the Euro's. You not considered that? Maybe he will only be temporary.

Right decision surely isn't it? How much experience of managing an international team in a big tournament does Harry have? How much does Hodgson have? Hodgeson has managed at international level and had some success. Redknapp simply hasn't got the experience so it does make sense to go with...