Search results

I keep asking because you keep giving the same empty answer. Do you have a link to it?

What three year plan?

What three year plan?

That’s an opinion rather than reading between the lines and even if Sharpe would consider it I doubt he’d get the backing of the CRFC board to do it. The possibility was clearly explored (when Anderson was here IIRC) even then CCFC was saying one thing about how the development would take shape...

What three year plan submitted to the council?

Yes he has. Not sure why you’re not taking note of them. He’s never said he doesn’t want anything to do with the football club so I’m not sure why you’re fabricating that he has.The ticket office doesn’t need to involve SISU. Redevelopment of BPA as a joint venture would be a different matter.

Yes and between Sharpe making his comments that you’ve quoted and the comments I’ve quoted Sharpe has taken ownership of the head lease but still hasn’t changed his tune on dealing with SISU. He’s also never once linked it to his own plans. His plans for the BPA and SISU’s were never the same...

Mmm. Doing the same thing expecting different results. What sort of idiot outfit would do that?

He’s been consistently clear on this. This is from last year "We will not deal with them as long as they are owned by Sisu," Sharp told BBC Coventry & Warwickshire. "They are a sister club bearing the city's name with a proud old history, who have fallen from grace, just like us. We're...

Block what? It was a bluff. There was nothing to block. I’m clearly saying that it was never tested and have explained why with some substance. It could have easily and cheaply been tested and long before any formal legal arrangement between Sharpe and SISU would have existed. It wasn’t...

That wasn’t what had been suggested and you know it.

You keep saying that as if it carries any weight. Try adding some substance to it. They can’t turn down planning based on the people someone deals with. The council would face more litigation if they even considered it and a successful appeal would give SISU all the ammunition they would need to...

Exactly. Why would he need the council to push some buttons to realise that getting into bed with SISU is a risk not worth taking. He’d have to have been living on the moon for the past 12 years to not realise that.

Not SISU. And he’s wisely keeping it that way.

On what grounds can the council refuse his plans? If they refuse his plans who would Sharpe appeal to? I don’t think you are being dumb, you know exactly what you’re saying. You’re banking on others being dumb enough to buy what you’re saying at face value without actually considering how...

I’m not naive. Neither is Sharpe. Hence he won’t get involved with SISU, as he’s made abundantly clear.

So you’re seriously suggesting that Sharpe was wanting to deal with SISU but the council stopped him? You’re slating the council for doing that why? If what you’re suggesting is true then the council has clearly done CRFC a favour and Sharpe clearly shouldn’t be in control of a city asset like...

Leo Varadkar words were far more telling and on the button.

I think you’re problem for you is people won’t play dumb and ignore the facts. The council owns no part of ACL and all debts have been settled. Why are the council going to waste time and energy on it when they’ve got enough real and tangible problems to deal with in Coventry? You’re trying to...

I don’t think any of what you’ve just suggested happened actually happened. Any talk of the Butts was a passing comment from Tim and an article in the Observer based on those passing comments. Sharpe very quickly put an end to it with his statement. It was clearly a bluff Sharpe didn’t buy or...