Search results

Funny how the pounds shot up today of the back of the news that Parliament will get a vote on delaying Brexit. Surely if it was going to be the promised utopia then the pound would have dropped at the prospect of a delay.

You could be right. It was so long ago and my memory isn’t what it once was.

It was certainly his time. I seem to remember press photos of Strachan on site wearing a hard hat while it’s being demolished and doing his best to look interested. It sticks in my mind because I think he might have been sacked the following week.

I’m sure he’s rubbing his hands with glee by the decision. It’s got him some more column inches and is exactly the sort of ammo he needs in his quest for attention. They’ve done him a big favour.

That’s the thing. For something that was promised to be so easy it ain’t half hard work.

He’s not been assassinated yet so possibly.

EU’s fault.

What the question is going to be is the valid point. If it’s another in out then I’m not for it. However if it tests what’s believed to be cross party consensus of a customs union then I’m in. Put that to the people. That was May’s biggest failure and it happened on day one. She should have...

It puts pressure on the government but as Pete say, too little too late. This sort of statement should have been made straight after their conference.

Did you see the YouTube link I put up for you. It dumbs down why RM was trying to justify the South African concentration camps with what can only be described as bullshit. Thought it might help you out.

I guess it depends on what you mean by cock. My definition would be someone who justifies the indiscriminate bombing of civilians. Whereas you think someone is a cock if they don’t think indiscriminate bombing of civilians is justifiable. I guess it’s all about perspective. For the record if...

Meanwhile back in Brexit land Labour move to back new Brexit referendum

Good offer. I’ll be taking advantage of this. So long as the JHW are camping out overnight obviously.

More deliberately tied than crossed.

Yes he did. He claimed that the death rate was the same as Glasgow. Aside from the fact he deliberately didn’t compare it to the death rate in South Africa outside of the camps when the government took direct control of the camps from the army following lobbying from decent MPs and pressure...

Clearly Germany would have wagged their fingers at Churchill and Stalin, called them cheeky scamps and told them to be on their way. That’s the alternative to the suggestion that they would have been trialed by the Nazi’s. It’s madness to the point of moronic to suggest that they wouldn’t have...

If you haven’t said it was justified then WTF are you ranting on about? By the way, someone did say it was justified so why not have a go at them for that? Given your self proclaimed neutrality.

That’s still not what he said but let me se if I’ve got this right. Having won the war you think that the Nazi’s, that’s the Nazi’s, would have put themselves on trial for the atrocities that they committed during the war to clear their name of war crimes? Why?

He probably reads your posts and thinks he’s got an audience.