Search results

  1. Mucca Mad Boys

    Is Stuart Linnell correct?

    We beat a superior side but AET, so technically drew you forgot we in 90m v Burton, an inferior league team, we couldn't score and won on pens. At least we beat D&R in 90m (on a pen, oh well). You can't attack Thorn without attacking Shaw, fact is, in the league, we had 2 repectable drew and...
  2. Mucca Mad Boys

    Is Stuart Linnell correct?

    Not going to lie, I quite like Waggott, he isn't too bad, so may I ask why you think differently? It has took a long time to appoint Robins, BUT, as Waggot said (it was blindly obvious though) it was a process we couldn't have rushed, which we have done in the past and STILL failied, so we...
  3. Mucca Mad Boys

    robins barnsley formation at cov

    The 4-2-2-1 is with wingers, like a 4-2-3-1, but the wingers more defencsive do like this: RB----CB----CB---- LB ------DM------DM----- W-----------------------W ----------AMC------------ -----------ST-------------- That's what I saw when I went Barnsley away and lost 2-1 (under AB) and...
  4. Mucca Mad Boys

    Jermaine Grandison interview

    And Reading in the league when we lost 3-1, he looked a mess! But then again, so did Ben Turner until AB took over... Fair play for him for turning it around, shame it weren't with us!
  5. Mucca Mad Boys

    CET: STEVE Waggott insists Mark Robins was first choice

    I think Robins was 1st choice, highly doubt Ince would get to the 'final hurdle' and walk away, and Robins hasn't technically failed at a club yet (we're prob about to ruin that!) Whereas Ince has either succeeded, or failed really bad!
  6. Mucca Mad Boys

    Formation

    Kilbane is the logical man, but I don't think it should mean he plays 100% of the time. 1 loan I think - realistically, MAYBE 2, then that's it.
Top