Search results

And there in lies the point of disagreement. You believe that moving a club 85 miles away from its original base is a sign of running a club well. I think it's disgraceful.

If you want to trade patronising insults instead because you feel superior that's your choice.

More like the capability.... But oh well.

Is Grendel referring to the notion that the legal action isn't costing SISU as they have an 'insurance' in as far as its no win no fee? Or something like that....?

Maybe that's not the intention as such, but they have no regard for the collateral damage in achieving their aims.

It's not possible to do that.

It can't be 'sold' in that form. It's only value is in selling as part of a club which is allowed to play in the respective league.

You could always... You know... Respond to the valid question.

The only club that outgrew its home, but when it 'fills' it's new home the majority are opposing fans..... :banghead:

But that is irrelevant now. What is relevant is that Wasps, along with their cronies want to destroy us. We have to fight them.

Protecting a 100+ year sporting legacy of a city is worth more than a quick buck from London. CCFC will always bring more financially to the city as a whole than Wasps ever will.

Don I'm not talking about you - but you only need to go onto Twitter, the CET site to see that there are people that are relishing in our struggles. And they call themselves fans. We've done blame - and it falls at everyone's feet. Some people want to go further to exact revenge and don't care...

I did actually read it all - and agree with a great deal. My anger is centred on the fact that CCFC is like a man laying seriously injured on the ground whilst Wasps are kicking the life out of him.... The bystanders are cheering despite supposedly being the mans friends - trouble is they don't...

Sport is unique in the fact that it's stakeholders have that emotive connection to the club they support, as well as the community from which it originates. This is why franchise sport is wrong - it's a betrayal of this fundamental principle.

Then you are going to have to explain this one to us...

This will simply not happen IMO - liquidation would mean instant revoking of golden share. And whilst it doesn't have a monetary value itself, it is really the only 'asset' the club has.

And what approach would you apply? The abandon your roots and move 85 miles away for the fun of it approach?

I understand perfectly - they had a choice and they were fully aware of what they did. They weren't 'forced' into it.

The irony meter is in overdrive tonight.