Search results

nah

@Grendel I am interested why you tried to bring up Kier Starmer ifit wasn't a failed attempt to link the current Labour leadership to this scandal?

challenge was about a yellow but you can't kick out like that

and they are stupid to kick out like that

should be down to 10

it just no one knows if we are actually interested, it's not a position of need and it looks like he is off to the MLS and not a bigger European league

Can you try not to answer with a nonsense word salad next time? Why did you bring up Kier Starmer when it is the post office who acted as the prosecutor and not the CPS? It seems strange if you are as you say not trying to make a party political point.

Has anyone seen him play? The amount people mention him you'd think he was Baresi meets Maldini

Are you going to acknowledge that the CPS only dealt with 3 cases during Starmers time as DPP?

it's also meaningless who was DPP as the vast majority of cases in england and wales (all apart from 3) were private prosecutions so the CPS was not the prosecutor Scotland and NI have their own versions of the CPS

there were 3 convictions dealt with by the CPS in Stamers time as DPP so 3 cases out of 4 million dealt with during his time The vast majority of cases were private prosecutions brought without the use of the CPS

in the pre robins era it would of been better value on those weeks

Lingard? Nah, we want someone who adds to squad and not someone who would want it to be all about them.

you pay after the game don't you?

who is being defensive? You just accused 2 people of being involved when they were not also that private eye piece, it is a recentish article and for the life of me I can't see where it says they wrote about the widespread issue before CW did in 2009?

the vast majority of people aren't skulling 5 pints there

You are trying to make it party political I on the other hand am more than happy to praise former Tory MP and now Peer Lord Arbuthnot for his work in proving the issues existed and the supplier and the post office were covering them up.

you tell me as it is widely reported and accepted that first story on the subject was in 2009 Google doesn't seem to bring up anything either so please show us all where Private Eye publish claims that the system was causing issues so widespread?

5 pints? ok then

it would of been in the blair years but what does that actually matter? at that point in time no one outside maybe a few people at a computing company new of any issues this is why it took 5 years of digging for CW to get enough to actually be able to break a story on it